On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I disagree with this. The most important artifacts are the > zips/tars that go to dist/. These *are* the ASF release. Nexus > makes it *harder* IMO to maintain provenance of these artifacts. These artifacts are present in Nexus. Pulling them to a temporary directory is quite easy with wget. At which point I can see no difference between your proposed solution and this one. And there's nothing to do for all the other files that live in Nexus (and must live, because Maven is just too important, whether we like it or not). > I also don't see why we *must* rely on proprietary software to > manage replication. I'm mostly with you on that. I strongly opposed choosing Nexus in favour of Archiva for that very reason. But we have Nexus now and I wouldn't want to have Commons a swimmer against the rest of the Apache tide. Jochen -- I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
