It's not a regression issue though. I'd recommend opening up a JIRA item to make sure it's something that 0.6 thinks about.
Hen On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: > I'm a bit concerned by the low test coverage (~40%). Some classes like > ServiceDiscoveryTask are not even tested. > > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > > Le 27/04/2011 21:38, Simone Tripodi a écrit : >> >> Hi all guys! >> After the failed RC1, I'm here to propose a new Apache >> Commons-DIscovery release, based on RC2, please cast your votes! >> Many thanks in advance to everybody will take part to the vote process :) >> All the best, >> Simo >> >> Release notes: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/discovery/0.5/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt >> >> Tag: >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/discovery/tags/DISCOVERY_0_5_RC2/ >> >> Site: >> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/discovery/0.5/RC2/site/ >> >> Binaries: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/discovery/0.5/RC2/staged/commons-discovery/commons-discovery/0.5/ >> >> [ ] +1 release it >> [ ] +0 go ahead I don't care >> [ ] -1 no, do not release it because >> >> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ >> http://www.99soft.org/ >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
