Or maybe Log4j 2 could replace [logging]. Gary
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Stephen Colebourne <scolebou...@joda.org> wrote: > My thought is that there might be some java.util.logging helpers that > could be written, and perhaps they might go in [lang] if there are 5 > or fewer classes. > > I assume that slf4j and log4j have their own j.u.logging connections, > so that end is dealt with. > > The time of [logging] has probably passed. > > Stephen > > > On 3 August 2011 06:50, Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 1:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg <ebo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> Le 28/07/2011 22:01, Henri Yandell a écrit : >>>> >>>> Personally I'm happy for commons-logging to die. :) >>> >>> Yeah let's use java.util.logging instead :) >> >> Primarily that I don't get the feeling we have a major community of >> developers on c-logging. We implemented it because we needed something >> for our other components (though many simply chose not to log), but it >> was never the passion of anybody here (hopefully not an incorrect >> statement). Robert, Simon and others put in tons of good work, but I >> feel that was duty not passion. >> >> So happy to see it die because it's something that's headed to >> dormancy (be it stable or not). >> >> Hen >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Thank you, Gary http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
