Paul, > BTW, in terms of swelling community development, if LOG4J+JCL were to > merge and just become JCL2, it could have the visibility of all > Commons committers. Isn't it much more of a common component than a > separate project? I think the logging project is dysfunctional anyway > -- make it a common component if possible.
in logging.apache.org are other sub projects doing similar stuff, like log4php, log4c and such. In addition there is the companions subproject. And there is some activity in the logging project. We have had a new addition to the PMC recently and log4php has released a new version before a short while. Together with the log4j2 efforts and the efforts put from time to time into cmpanions and chainsaw, I would say the project is a bit silent, but not dead. If you take out log4j, everything else in logging would become instable. > > Paul > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- http://www.grobmeier.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
