On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org> wrote: > I prefer Apache driven projects when possible. If LOG4J2 takes off, > feature requests would be implemented quicker, I hope.
I like Log4J just fine thank you very much :) I'm looking forward to 2.0. Gary > > On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:27 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: >> >> On Aug 3, 2011, at 6:07 AM, David Karlsen wrote: >> >>> Hasn't the time for both CL and log4j passed by? The trend nowadays seems to >>> be slf4j/logback. >> >> If you read further back in this thread you will see where I highlighted the >> problems in Logback as well as difficulties with SLF4J. Plus, every time >> Ceki goes on vacation everything stops. >> >> Ralph >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > -- Thank you, Gary http://garygregory.wordpress.com/ http://garygregory.com/ http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/ http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
