I'm in favor of removing @author tags too, developers are enlisted on the pom. usually at commons we keep @author tags in existing components, anyway OGNL is a fresh new codebase so +1 for it :) All the best, have a nice WE! Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, the old discussion. > > OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I > prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn > history. > > In addition: > * $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $ > > This line must not be the first of the license header, otherwise > checkstyle is crying. In addition I have never understood the sense of > that line. I am +1 for removing it too (svn history does all i need). > > If we keep it, we need to move it on class level docs. > > OK, let the rumble begin... your opinions gents! > > CHeers > Christian > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
