On 15 October 2011 09:59, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]> wrote: > Again, the old discussion. > > OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I > prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn > history. > > In addition: > * $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $ > > This line must not be the first of the license header, otherwise > checkstyle is crying. In addition I have never understood the sense of > that line. I am +1 for removing it too (svn history does all i need).
Can be useful, if one comes across a source file in isolation from SVN. For example, in source archives. Also as comments in generated HTML files.. It's not harmful (if added in the correct location) so I'm +1 for keeping it. > If we keep it, we need to move it on class level docs. Or at least below the AL header. > OK, let the rumble begin... your opinions gents! > > CHeers > Christian > > -- > http://www.grobmeier.de > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
