On 15 October 2011 14:06, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > There was an ASF guideline or suggestion a couple of years ago to use > "Apache Software Foundation" in author tags.
Not that I remember. The board recommendation [1] was to not use @author tags at all. [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2004/board_minutes_2004_09_22.txt Section 7, subsection F Using @author ASF probably does not go against the spirit of the recommendation; I just don't see the point. > Gary > > On Oct 15, 2011, at 8:17, Emmanuel Bourg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> -0 on the @author tag since I'm not involved in OGNL. >> >> I find it a bit rude to remove the signature from someone else work. But >> feel free to remove your own name. >> >> Emmanuel Bourg >> >> >> Le 15/10/2011 10:59, Christian Grobmeier a écrit : >>> Again, the old discussion. >>> >>> OGNL has @author tags. I do not like them. Who wants to keep them? I >>> prefer a developers section in the pom and of course there is svn >>> history. >>> >>> In addition: >>> * $Id: ASTAdd.java 1183232 2011-10-14 07:40:32Z grobmeier $ >>> >>> This line must not be the first of the license header, otherwise >>> checkstyle is crying. In addition I have never understood the sense of >>> that line. I am +1 for removing it too (svn history does all i need). >>> >>> If we keep it, we need to move it on class level docs. >>> >>> OK, let the rumble begin... your opinions gents! >>> >>> CHeers >>> Christian >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
