On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 8:00 AM, Luc Maisonobe <luc.maison...@free.fr> wrote: > Le 18/12/2011 23:10, James Carman a écrit : >> My concern is that the momentum dies off after we get it in proper and then >> we have to demote it later. > > I don't see any problem with this. For now the component seems to have a > community, hence it is worht promoting it (this is a +1 from me). If > later on the community fades away, then the component will move away, > it's OK. >
Indeed, thanks Luc, I don't see either what the issue is on managing components lifecycle - if people lost interest on it, just open a new vote to move it back to dormant. we can bee conservative but dynamic at the same time. http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
