On 4 May 2012 14:06, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > On 13/04/2012 22:16, ma...@apache.org wrote: >> sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> 1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE >>>> 2. Clean up the docs. DONE >>>> 3. Release 2.0.0.M1 > > I think we are ready for an alpha release of POOL2. I'm leaning towards > Alpha since I don't believe POOL2 is feature complete - specifically I'm > expecting to add some abandoned object tracking to POOL2.
Does Alpha mean we don't guarantee binary compatibiity? BTW, I'm seeing test errors on Win XP: Failed tests: testMinIdle(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): Should be 5 idle, found 0 testMinIdleMaxTotalPerKey(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): Should be 5 idle, found 0 testConstructors(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): expected:<0> but was:<1> Tests in error: testConstructors(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): factory may not be null The last one is probably a test bug, as the ctor specifically rejects null factory. > The only stumbling block is I don't have the first clue how to do the > release. Any pointers and/or offers of help. I can probably help with that. > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
