sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 4 May 2012 14:06, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 13/04/2012 22:16, ma...@apache.org wrote: >>> sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 12 April 2012 20:46, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> 1. Fix all the open bugs. DONE >>>>> 2. Clean up the docs. DONE >>>>> 3. Release 2.0.0.M1 >> >> I think we are ready for an alpha release of POOL2. I'm leaning >towards >> Alpha since I don't believe POOL2 is feature complete - specifically >I'm >> expecting to add some abandoned object tracking to POOL2. > >Does Alpha mean we don't guarantee binary compatibiity? Until we do a non-alpha/beta release I don't think we guarantee anything. >BTW, I'm seeing test errors on Win XP: > >Failed tests: > testMinIdle(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): >Should be 5 idle, found 0 >testMinIdleMaxTotalPerKey(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): >Should be 5 idle, found 0 >testConstructors(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): >expected:<0> but was:<1> OK. I'll take a look. I haven't run them in a few days and was expecting the CI to flag up problems. > >Tests in error: >testConstructors(org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.TestGenericKeyedObjectPool): >factory may not be null > >The last one is probably a test bug, as the ctor specifically rejects >null factory. +1. I think I added that recently. >> The only stumbling block is I don't have the first clue how to do the >> release. Any pointers and/or offers of help. > >I can probably help with that. Excellent. Thanks. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
