Hi. > > > I thought that you were almost finished with the "Beta" function. > > How much time would you need to resolve the issue? > > > > I thought so too. The code is written, but I've noticed that a few changes > must be done. And I have to decide what is the best place for all these > auxiliary functions. I could put them all in Beta (even if some of them are > only related to Gamma), so that they could all be private (referring to our > other conversation). I've also noticed that there is some code duplication > in those auxiliary functions (FORTRAN people do like copy/paste...). > So all in all, that's not major work, but there is still quite a few > refactoring + users guide to update. As I'm fairly busy at work, I don't > want to engage on a date. Instead of committting incrementaly, I'm going to > prepare the whole thing locally. If I can commit it in time for 3.1, that > will be for the best. Otherwise, I guess it can wait until 3.1.1 or 3.2. > Anyway, the final goal is the incomplete regularized beta function, and > this is not even started... (and will be VERY long).
Thanks for the explanation. I'll thus postpone MATH-738. Gilles --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
