Hi,

2012/11/28 Gilles Sadowski <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org>

> Hi.
>
> >
> > > I thought that you were almost finished with the "Beta" function.
> > > How much time would you need to resolve the issue?
> > >
> > > I thought so too. The code is written, but I've noticed that a few
> changes
> > must be done. And I have to decide what is the best place for all these
> > auxiliary functions. I could put them all in Beta (even if some of them
> are
> > only related to Gamma), so that they could all be private (referring to
> our
> > other conversation). I've also noticed that there is some code
> duplication
> > in those auxiliary functions (FORTRAN people do like copy/paste...).
> > So all in all, that's not major work, but there is still quite a few
> > refactoring + users guide to update. As I'm fairly busy at work, I don't
> > want to engage on a date. Instead of committting incrementaly, I'm going
> to
> > prepare the whole thing locally. If I can commit it in time for 3.1, that
> > will be for the best. Otherwise, I guess it can wait until 3.1.1 or 3.2.
> > Anyway, the final goal is the incomplete regularized beta function, and
> > this is not even started... (and will be VERY long).
>
> Thanks for the explanation. I'll thus postpone MATH-738.
>
> Gilles
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
> That's probably better. I will try to speed things up, but...
S

Reply via email to