There's one other issue - Commons Codec does not support soft line breaks in quoted printable decoding. As far as I know, those are required.
On 19 March 2013 19:46, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, you can shade only the classes needed. Getting rid of code that does > the same thing across multiple Commons components seems a worthwhile use of > time IMO and really shouldn't represent any more work than fixing the > broken classes in [fileupload]. Also, no triage is required to figure out > how to implement this solution, as opposed to the case with fixing buggy > code. > Matt > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 2:30 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> -1 if this results in a huge increase in size of the jar. >> If shading can extract only the required classes, that might be OK, >> but it seems like a lot of work when the code already works for valid >> input. >> >> I think the only outstanding problems are the way the decoders handle >> invalid input. >> >> >> On 19 March 2013 19:25, Maurizio Cucchiara <mcucchi...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Why not depend on [codec] and shade, then? >> > +1 >> > >> > Maurizio Cucchiara >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
