Hi Maurizio, Maurizio Cucchiara wrote:
> So do I, but looking at the throws list it seems that final is not > supported (although write a private one is) by design (which can be a > valid point) Try it. The documentation might be a simple relict from Java 1.4 functionality. Cheers, Jörg > > Maurizio Cucchiara > > > On 22 November 2013 13:37, Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hmm, I would have expected [1] (with terminating argument true) to have >> worked for your purposes. >> >> Matt >> [1] >> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/javadocs/api-3.1/org/apache/commons/lang3/reflect/FieldUtils.html#writeStaticField(java.lang.Class, >> java.lang.String, java.lang.Object, boolean) >> On Nov 22, 2013 3:49 AM, "Maurizio Cucchiara" <mcucchi...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> yesterday I was trying to write a static final field in order to mock >>> it and I realised that there is no way to do that using the Common >>> way. >>> >>> I expected to find something similar on FieldUtils class [1]. >>> >>> I know that is not a very good practice and in case of primitive field >>> or enabled security manager it is unlikely that works. >>> >>> But it seems a common pattern, so why do not include in Lang? >>> >>> Maurizio Cucchiara >>> >>> [1] >>> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-lang/javadocs/api-3.1/org/apache/commons/lang3/reflect/FieldUtils.html >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
