On 1/15/15 2:24 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 01/08/2015 12:34 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Raising this issue once again.
>> Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release?
>>
>   [ ] Java 5
>   [x] Java 6
>   [x] Java 7
>   [ ] Java 8
>   [ ] Java 9
>
> A while ago I thought that it would be cool to switch to Java 7/8 for
> some of the nice new features (mainly fork/join, lambda expressions and
> diamond operator, the rest is more or less unimportant for math imho).
>
> But after some thoughts I think they are not really needed for the
> following reasons:
>
>  * the main focus of math is on developing high-quality, well tested and
> documented algorithms, the existing language features are more than
> enough for this

+1
>
>  * coming up with multi-threaded algorithms might be appealing but it is
> also hard work and I wonder if it really makes sense in the times of
> projects like mahout / hadoop / ... which aim for even better scalability

+1

My HO is we should focus on getting the best single-threaded
implementations we can and, where possible, setting things up to be
executed in parallel by other engines.  Spawning and managing
threads internal to [math] actually *reduces* the range of
applicability of our stuff.  Much better to let Hadoop / Mahout et
al parallelize using fast and accurate piece parts that we can
provide.  If there are parallel algorithms that we are really dying
to implement directly, I would rather see that done in a way that
encapsulates and enables externalization of the thread management.
>
>  * staying at Java 6/7 does not block users to use math in a Java 8
> environment if wanted

+1 - the examples I have seen thus far are all things that could be
done fairly easily with client code.  I know we don't all agree with
this, but I think the biggest service we can provide to our user
base is good, tested, supported implementations of standard
algorithms.  I wish we could find a way to focus more on that and
less on fiddling with the API or language features.

Phil
>
> just my 2cents
>
> Thomas
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to