Hi Paul
> if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I was
unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
"standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
Any kind of background on old issues is welcome! Before I start to work on any
issue,
I'll triage old issues, try to find some low hanging fruits, and then will
start a one or two dayresearch on the mailing list to see if I can learn as
much as possible before coding.
>I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly and
I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning technology,
that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the time
I met them.
I will work a little bit every weekend on triage issues, but will have a one or
two week cyclein the middle of June and in July (lovely weather for coding;
cold, cloudy, and raining a lot :)
>Hope it helps.
>I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better.
It definitely helps. Very happy for having someone I can ask questions about
some old issuesin [jelly] :)
ThanksBruno
From: Paul Libbrecht <[email protected]>
To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, May 3, 2015 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: [jelly] Working on some old issues
On 1/05/15 10:22, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote:
> Since I joined Commons I've had a special interest in [jelly] due to its
> importance in the Jenkins project.
>
> Jenkins uses a patched version of [jelly]. Kohsuke, creator of Jenkins,
> is/was a Commons committer too, and submitted some issues. I intend to
> investigate if that'd be doable fix the issues to a point that Jenkins can
> drop the patched version, and [jelly] can be updated and released again.
Hello Bruno,
if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I was
unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
"standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
Thus, I can only encourage you to go ahead. I think it would be nice to
have both worlds working well with a single code base.
I have not been able to save cycles to address more issues of Jelly and
I know of some other folks, fellows in research in learning technology,
that were, looking forward to getting more releases of jelly at the time
I met them.
Hope it helps.
I am happy to help you if I can towards making it better.
paul
