Le 05/11/2015 12:25, Gilles a écrit :
> Hello.
> 
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:13:00 +0100, luc wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to release 3.6 in the upcoming weeks.
>> There have been a bunch of bug fixes and a few evolutions that are
>> important to me.
> 
> s/3.6/4.0/
> 
> And the statement is still true.
> 
>> [...]
>>
>> Of course, once 3.6 is out the MATH_3_X branch will remain alive and
>> we could also release other versions later on in the 3.x series.
> 
> Should we worry that the next major release will be endlessly delayed?

I think we are really quite far from releasing 4.0 as in many packages
we did not even start refactoring API. Optimization is clearly the most
well known example, but there are also other things waiting in the pipe
for geometry and ode.

best regards,
Luc

> 
> Regards,
> Gilles
> 
>> What do other developers want to have in the 3.6 release?
>>
>> Of course, I volunteer to be the release manager.
>>
>> best regards,
>> Luc
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> 
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to