Kristian Rosenvold wrote:

>   We have fixed quite a few bugs and added some significant
> enhancements since commons-io was released,
>   so I would like to release commons-io 2.5
> 
>   Foo 2.5 RC1 is available for review here:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision
>     11266)
> 
>   Maven artifacts are here:
>    
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1123
> 
>   Details of changes since 2.4 are in the release notes:
>     https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
>     
> http://people.apache.org/~krosenvold/commons-io-2.5-RC1/changes-report.html
> 
>   I have tested this with JDK 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8.
> 
>   The tag is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/io/tags/commons-io-2.5-RC1
> (r1715890)
> 
>   Site:
>      http://people.apache.org/~krosenvold/commons-io-2.5-RC1/
>   (note some *relative* links are broken and the 2.5 directories are
>   not yet created - these will be OK once the site is deployed)
> 
>   Clirr Report (compared to 2.4):
>      http://people.apache.org/~krosenvold/commons-io-2.5-RC1/clirr-report.html
> 
> 
>   RAT Report:
>      http://people.apache.org/~krosenvold/commons-io-2.5-RC1/rat-report.html
> 
>   KEYS:
>   https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> 
>   Please review the release candidate and vote.
>   This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after
> 19:00 CET 26-March 2015
> 
>   [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>   [ ] +0 OK, but...
>   [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
>   [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...


IBM JDK 1.6 fails (as usual):
=========================== %< =======================
Failed tests: 
  CharSequenceInputStreamTest.testBufferedRead_AvailableCharset:96-
>testBufferedRead:72 bytes should agree expected:<65> but was:<71>
  WriterOutputStreamTest.testUTF16WithSingleByteWrite:81-
>testWithSingleByteWrite:47 expected:<[à peine arrivés nous entrâmes dans sa 
chambre]> but was:<[＀ 瀀攀椀渀攀 愀爀爀椀瘀猀 渀漀甀猀 攀渀琀爀洀攀猀 搀愀渀猀 猀愀 挀栀愀洀戀爀]>
Tests in error: 
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUcs2:602->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Content...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUcs4:615->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Content...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUtf32Be:638->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Inva...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUtf32Le:647->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Inva...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithoutBOMUtf32Be:664->parseXml:158 » 
SAXParse I...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithoutBOMUtf32Le:672->parseXml:158 » 
SAXParse I...
  CharSequenceInputStreamTest.testAvailable:430->testAvailableSkip:391 » 
UnsupportedOperation

Tests run: 1156, Failures: 2, Errors: 7, Skipped: 2
=========================== %< =======================

IBM JDK 1.7 fails also:
=========================== %< =======================
Failed tests: 
  CharSequenceInputStreamTest.testBufferedRead_AvailableCharset:96-
>testBufferedRead:72 bytes should agree expected:<111> but was:<-3>
  WriterOutputStreamTest.testUTF16WithSingleByteWrite:81-
>testWithSingleByteWrite:47 expected:<[à peine arrivés nous entrâmes dans sa 
chambre]> but was:<[＀ 瀀攀椀渀攀 愀爀爀椀瘀猀 渀漀甀猀 攀渀琀爀洀攀猀 搀愀渀猀 猀愀 挀栀愀洀戀爀]>
Tests in error: 
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUcs2:602->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Content...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUcs4:615->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Content...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUtf32Be:638->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Inva...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithBOMUtf32Le:647->parseXml:158 » SAXParse 
Inva...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithoutBOMUtf32Be:664->parseXml:158 » 
SAXParse I...
  BOMInputStreamTest.testReadXmlWithoutBOMUtf32Le:672->parseXml:158 » 
SAXParse I...
  CharSequenceInputStreamTest.testAvailable:430->testAvailableSkip:391 » 
UnsupportedOperation
=========================== %< =======================


This test seems brittle, it failed for me one time using IcedTea 7 
(OpenJDK), but passed a 2nd run:
=========================== %< =======================
Failed tests: 
  TailerTest.testTailer:225 2 line count expected:<1> but was:<3>

Tests run: 1156, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 3
=========================== %< =======================

+1, since it's no regression that the IBM JDK's always fail these tests.

Cheers,
Jörg


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to