Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Josh, > > Josh Elser wrote: > >> Oh, well then! No pressure :) >> >> I'll have to find some time to re-read all of the conversation between >> Jörg and Stian, but my initial reaction is the same as what you were >> implying: compatibility across more JVMs would be great, but shouldn't >> block this 2.1 release.
Just an additional remark: Compatibility across more JVMs *is* an issue, since there are platforms where you have no other choice (IBM AIX, Mac, most Linux distributions use OpenJDK by default). > This depends always on the nature of a problem. Therefore I did not make > any vote for now. Currently it looks like you're right and thanks to Stian > the problems are covered in trunk on top (sole the problem with the IBM > JDKs). > >> The other points seem to be "nice to have"'s, but please bring it to my >> attention is my quick glance missed something that is really bad. > > Cheers, > Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
