Hi,

On 31.05.19 19:58, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
Hi Eric

Le ven. 31 mai 2019 à 19:29, Eric Barnhill <ericbarnh...@gmail.com> a écrit :

This is well worth discussing.

The protocol here could be improved. Where I work, we all write a lot of
code and we all have write access. We also *always* submit PRs rather than
push directly, and *always* request review from at least one other person.
This is because it is always risky to push code that doesn't have other
eyes on it.

So whether you get/have write access or not, I think the protocol should
always be PRs. That is common practice in industry. We could all make more
use of the "request review" portion of the PR interface. For numbers, this
might entail requesting review from Gilles and one peer. To clarify, this
is only my suggestion and others may disagree.

Partly (depending on the contents of the change).
And if we think we missed something important, then "git revert" should
be fine to restart the discussion.

Speaking to Fraction specifically where you have been contributing. First
of all thank you for your contributions there. I just about finished my
contributions to that module, but have been using my "Apache time" to
mentor the GSoC coders, and have not had time to consider the recent
suggestions. Please feel free to finish it and add your name as a
contributor. If you do I would prefer that you submit a PR and request
Gilles and myself for review.

The "fraction-dev" is fairly old (it does not work on travis anymore);
what about merging it to "master" (after a "rebase", I guess)?
Then we can ask PRs against "master" for the recent suggestions.

This is the way we  work in Maven Project working on a branch rebasing
it against master and merging it via fast forward onto Master...that
prevents the merge-commits which are confusing.


Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise
Apache Maven PMC


Best,
Gilles



On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:12 AM Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de>
wrote:

Hi to all,

I have contributed some PR#s (via GitHub) to the commons-numbers
project...(They have been accepted and merged ;-))

I have some questions:

1. The documentation[1] states that every Apache committer has write
access to the commons projects.

So I could change to use gitbox directly via branch instead of GitHub PR's.

The question is: What is the prefered way to contribute to the projects?

   - via GitHub PR
   - via Branch GitBox ?


2. I have already access to JIRA but unfortunately I can't assign JIRA
issue to myself ?

     Is this intentionally or is this an issue?


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Reply via email to