On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > > <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It sounds like we've agreed to > go with "1.0-beta1" for the release version so I'm wondering what to do > with the existing release branch (1.0-B1-release) and tag > (NUMBERS_1_0_B1_RC1). These should have probably been 1.0-beta1-release and > NUMBERS_1_0_BETA1_RC1. Is it possible to drop those and recreate them or > would it be better to leave the current branch and tag names as-is and use > the NUMBER_1_0_BETA1_RCX tag pattern going forward? > IMO, the tagging should be: <component-id>-<release>[-RC#] So: commons-number-1.0-beta1-RC1 commons-number-1.0-beta1 At least that's what I've been doing on all the release I RM. Gary > > > > > IMHO, no harm done by removing. > > > > Equally, what's the harm in leaving them? > > > > I would leave well alone for now at least. > > Can always delete the tag later if necessary. > > I prefer cleaning up while we know that it doesn't do any harm; > later, it's pretty certain that we'll wonder why it's there, and in > doubt, we probably will not delete anything. > > My understanding of the original question was whether it is > going to cause technical trouble. > > > > Can someone confirm? > > And my question above was indirectly referring to the once > upon a time mentioned that no branch could ever be deleted... > > > Regards, > Gilles > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
