Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 15:59, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 8:27 AM Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 14:11, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 at 23:20, Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi. > > > > > > > > Le lun. 30 mars 2020 à 23:37, Matt Juntunen > > > > <matt.juntu...@hotmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. I think I have the gpg key sorted now. > > > > > > > > > > I can probably start on RC2 tomorrow. It sounds like we've agreed to > > go with "1.0-beta1" for the release version so I'm wondering what to do > > with the existing release branch (1.0-B1-release) and tag > > (NUMBERS_1_0_B1_RC1). These should have probably been 1.0-beta1-release and > > NUMBERS_1_0_BETA1_RC1. Is it possible to drop those and recreate them or > > would it be better to leave the current branch and tag names as-is and use > > the NUMBER_1_0_BETA1_RCX tag pattern going forward? > > > > IMO, the tagging should be: > > <component-id>-<release>[-RC#] > > So: > > commons-number-1.0-beta1-RC1 > commons-number-1.0-beta1 >
For [Math] and [RNG] (and [Lang] until 3.10), $ git tag --list shows a format akin to MATH_3_6_1_RC Gilles > [...] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
