+1 for option 2 (commons-numbers-1.0-beta1-rc1) -Matt ________________________________ From: Rob Tompkins <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 7:07 AM To: Commons Developers List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Vote] Format of "git" tags
Option 2 - +1 > On Apr 1, 2020, at 7:02 AM, Gilles Sadowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello. > > This vote is a follow-up of the discussion that started in > another thread.[1] > > As one of the many small steps towards convergence of > the release processes for all Commons components, it is > proposed that the same format be used when creating "git" > tags.[2] > > As Gary noted (in the referred thread), the tag is namely used > when cloning a release candidate.[3] > > Alternatives (using the yet-to-be-created tag for the release > candidate of the first beta version of [Numbers] as an example): > > [ ] Option 1: NUMBERS_1_0_BETA1_RC1 > [ ] Option 2: commons-numbers-1.0-beta1-rc1 > [ ] Option 3: commons-numbers_v1.0-beta1_rc1 > > Please give your choice of the format that should be used from > now on. > > Thanks, > Gilles > > [1] https://markmail.org/message/n457skstbxbirvhp > [2] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Basics-Tagging > [3] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-clone > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
