Hi. Le jeu. 15 oct. 2020 à 17:29, Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > > On 15 Oct 2020, at 15:56, John Patrick <nhoj.patr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > <— snip --> > > > > Will look at vfs and maybe also rng regarding tidying up the tests etc. > > Did you mean ’tidying up math’? > > Regarding RNG, [...]
I fully concur with Alex that [RNG] is the last thing to change. The ratio of covered functionality to lines of codes is probably one of the highest in this project, thanks to him. And it is a *feature* that one can actually see some tests fail sometimes, with the expected probability! :-) In Commons Math however, it is mildly frightening that some tests only pass for a small proportion of the possible seeds. At best, such unit tests seem ill defined... Regards, Gilles P.S. For [RNG], the only thing worth (IMHO) upgrading the minimum JDK is JPMS indeed (cf. "commons-rng-examples/examples-jpms" maven module). Thus: Java 9 or beyond. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
