Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 20:33, Oliver Heger <oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de> a écrit : > > > > Am 05.05.21 um 20:26 schrieb Gilles Sadowski: > > Le mer. 5 mai 2021 à 18:57, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> > >> IMO the lack of +1s shows the lack of appetite to manage another component > > > > That's certainly true. > > And nobody is forced to do anything. > > > > When the other CM spin-offs started, there was only _one_ person > > willing to do the work. > > What about the sandbox? IIUC, every committer can start a new component > there. If then a community forms around this component, it can move to > proper (which would then require a vote). > > Would this be an option to get started?
[Graph] is listed in the sandbox[1], yet when someone expressed a willingness to contribute, we had a "git" repository created[2] (even though the web site has remained outdated[3], probably because the attempt was short-lived). So indeed, I could have already created the repository a few weeks ago... However in this instance, what would it mean to have codes that have lived within a "proper" component for 6 years and more be moved to "sandbox"? Regards, Gilles [1] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-graph/ [2] https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-graph.git [3] http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/commons-graph/source-repository.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
