> Code not actively developed does not attract newcomers. Well I have to say the reason for "codes not actively developed" is a strong lack of alive committers, or more detailed, reviewers. I have still 100+ unsolved prs in commons projects, some of which be 1 or 2 years ago, but it seems there just are not enough reviewers, and pr lists in every repo grows longer and longer. But on the other hand, free reviewers who have both ability and willingness to review, well, are really lacking, it is the truth.
Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> 于2022年2月14日周一 22:34写道： > Le lun. 14 févr. 2022 à 14:34, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > My guess is that this is a combination of the maturity of the components > > The "maturity" rationale is not an explanation; it is a cause. > Code not actively developed does not attract newcomers. > It is not an "opinion" anymore; it is backed by the fact that > "Commons Math" API modernization had stalled on the basis > of that rationale; yet since the path has been unblocked, work > on [RNG], [Numbers], [Geometry], [Statistics] and [Math] itself > demonstrated how much room there was for improving[1] those > "mature" codes. > > Regards, > Gilles > > [1] Thanks to all who did it! > > > and people having moved on to jobs or hobbies that no longer requires > these > > components. > > > > Gary > > > >>> [...] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >
