Remember that creating a PR is not a guarantee of anything, it is a request
in a queue, a queue managed by volunteers.

Gary

On Mon, Feb 14, 2022, 10:12 Xeno Amess <xenoam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >  Code not actively developed does not attract newcomers.
> Well I have to say the reason for "codes not actively developed" is a
> strong lack of alive committers, or more detailed, reviewers.
> I have still 100+ unsolved prs in commons projects, some of which be 1 or 2
> years ago, but it seems there just are not enough reviewers, and pr lists
> in every repo grows longer and longer.
> But on the other hand, free reviewers who have both ability and willingness
> to review, well, are really lacking, it is the  truth.
>
> Gilles Sadowski <gillese...@gmail.com> 于2022年2月14日周一 22:34写道:
>
> > Le lun. 14 févr. 2022 à 14:34, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> > >
> > > My guess is that this is a combination of the maturity of the
> components
> >
> > The "maturity" rationale is not an explanation; it is a cause.
> > Code not actively developed does not attract newcomers.
> > It is not an "opinion" anymore; it is backed by the fact that
> > "Commons Math" API modernization had stalled on the basis
> > of that rationale; yet since the path has been unblocked, work
> > on [RNG], [Numbers], [Geometry], [Statistics] and [Math] itself
> > demonstrated how much room there was for improving[1] those
> > "mature" codes.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gilles
> >
> > [1] Thanks to all who did it!
> >
> > > and people having moved on to jobs or hobbies that no longer requires
> > these
> > > components.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > >>> [...]
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to