Do we want to keep JMX support for 3.0? Just curious, Gary
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 19:32 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great, thanks for the update :-) > > Gary > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 19:11 Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I am doing soak tests now on the 2,x branch code and with DBCP. >> >> Phil >> >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 8:19 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > The master branch is now on 3.0 and we have a 2.x branch as well. >> > >> > The next release will be 2.12.0 and then we can keep discussing how to >> > handle 3: exceptions and API changes. >> > >> > Gary >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 2:01 PM Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > +1 >> > > >> > > Phil >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:41 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi all, >> > > > >> > > > This is a switch from the 2.12.0 vote mail thread in order to >> discuss >> > 3.0 >> > > > and 2.x releases. >> > > > >> > > > I propose we switch master to 3.0 and create a branch called 2.x >> based >> > and >> > > > an old commit and release 2.12.0 from there. >> > > > >> > > > Gary >> > > > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org >> > >> > >> >
