I think we probably should keep it. I see now tomcat still supports it, so would require more forking / munging to add it back if we drop it. There may be other downstreams that depend on it. So I would say keep it.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:59 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Do we want to keep JMX support for 3.0? > > Just curious, > Gary > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 19:32 Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Great, thanks for the update :-) > > > > Gary > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 19:11 Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> I am doing soak tests now on the 2,x branch code and with DBCP. > >> > >> Phil > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 8:19 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > The master branch is now on 3.0 and we have a 2.x branch as well. > >> > > >> > The next release will be 2.12.0 and then we can keep discussing how to > >> > handle 3: exceptions and API changes. > >> > > >> > Gary > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 2:01 PM Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > +1 > >> > > > >> > > Phil > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:41 AM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi all, > >> > > > > >> > > > This is a switch from the 2.12.0 vote mail thread in order to > >> discuss > >> > 3.0 > >> > > > and 2.x releases. > >> > > > > >> > > > I propose we switch master to 3.0 and create a branch called 2.x > >> based > >> > and > >> > > > an old commit and release 2.12.0 from there. > >> > > > > >> > > > Gary > >> > > > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
