FWIW, the only reason I have JDK 8 on my machines is Apache. Gary
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 18:15 Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exactly. I think at major version cuts, we should drop support for JDKs > that are no longer supported [1]. Part of that is simply availability of > JDKs to test against and the implied commitment to do that testing and fix > bugs that may be JDK-specific. Part of it is to allow use of new language > features. We only have this opportunity once - when we start the new major > version - and IMO we should always take it. > > Phil > > [1] That is getting a little trickier now with LTS. > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 2:42 PM Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The simplest way to bake in JPMS automatically is to build with the > > Moditect plugin and Java 11. > > > > There is also an expectation from new contributors that current > development > > does not happen on the dead and EOL Java 8. It will be nice to at least > > have the option to use new language features and APIs. > > > > This is a major release and the perfect and expected time to bump Java > > versions IMO. > > > > Gary > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023, 17:21 Alex Herbert <alex.d.herb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 19 Jul 2023 at 19:38, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > OK, that sounds good. > > > > > > > > Gary > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 5:50 PM Phil Steitz <phil.ste...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I would say 17 for 3.0. > > > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > Are there aspects of Pool that require moving away from JDK 8? Such a > > > move would restrict downstream consumers of the library. > > > > > > Alex > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
