Thanks for the data point. This means that marcmail.com is no longer indexing 
women@

I have no idea why. 

However, the arguments for bringing women@ into comdev stand in my opinion. 

Sent from my mobile device.

On 17 Jul 2010, at 18:44, Anjana G Bhattacharjee <a.g.bhattachar...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> 
>> A little history is probably relevant here. Woman@ was set up on Aug 7
>> 2005, during that time it has had very little activity with the most recent
>> email being Sept 14th 2007.
> 
> 
>> The fact is that people are not looking for a list called "women@".
>> Nevertheless the reasons that the list was originally created are still
>> valid.
>> 
>> The community development project was created last year. In our original
>> resolution we had not proposed taking the women@ "activity". Instead we
>> are focussing on making it easier for people in general rather than on the
>> issues facing a specific group. The board requested that we take ownership
>> of the women@ work too. Since women@ has always been "just a list" it has
>> had no official role in the foundation. Bringing the activity into ComDev
>> provides a vehicle through which more action can be taken if there are
>> people willing and able to undertake such action.
>> 
>> Rolling the women@ list into the d...@community.a.o list need not be a
>> permanent solution. If there is sufficient momentum behind the 
>> wo...@objectives then we could, at some point in the future, create
>> wo...@community.apache.org - however, at this point in time there is no
>> need for such a list as demonstrated by the lack of activity on the existing
>> women@ list [2].
>> 
> 
> Please note that the source data used above is incorrect, with the most
> recent email activity actually going a little way beyond Sept 14th 2007 [1],
> including an interesting post dated 3rd March 2009 [2] which links to some
> research work done on the "Effects of Gender Socialization on Females in the
> Open Source Community" [3]
> 
> Hope this helps, A
> 
> [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-women/
> [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-women/200903.mbox/browser
> [3] http://short-stack.net/Paper.pdf

Reply via email to