Hi, On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > ...Farmers know that large hay stacks are susceptible to spontaneous > combustion....
But in general we love busy lists [1] (shameless plug but the original is not from me) > ...I wonder whether multiple smaller lists, maybe including > reviving some existing but little known lists, might work better? For > example, tech-java, tech-cpp, tech-standards, etc. That also makes > the discussion more cohesive and potentially more relevant to the > subscribers.... That would defeat the purpose of a list that brings together all bright Apache community folks who have cross-cutting questions about our projects, and with a well defined (organically well-defined that is) set of [subject tags] people can filter at will. -Bertrand [1] http://grep.codeconsult.ch/2011/12/06/stefanos-mazzocchis-busy-list-pattern/
