Le mardi 5 mai 2015 01:05:31 sebb a écrit : > > OK, but that's because whoever code the XSLT decided to be defensive to > > such interpretation. > > If you read back in this thread you will see that I did this in order > to support both asfext:PMC and asfext:pmc. > > > But that does not mean is right. > > The code is right in the sense that it works with the input files that > are provided. +1 that's a temporary workaround that we should try to not need any more in the future
[...] > >> Also if it is possible to validate that the various RDF files are > >> correct according to the formal definitions. > >> PMCs could then submit their files for checking. > > > > I think we can discuss that infrastructure for the new site. I'm happy to > > help. Python provides the required libraries. I'll open a thread, probably > > tomorrow. > > I think there needs to be a way for PMCs to check their RDF files > against the formal definitions. > For example, a CGI script that accepts the URL of a file. +1 I tried W3C checker, but as it is only a syntax checker, it checked only syntax, not references to the namespace and I couldn't find any other useful tool :( Other tools to make effective use of the DOAP files would be useful too: but I completely agree that the first priority seems to have a more complete checker Regards, Hervé > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > Sergio Fernández > > Partner Technology Manager > > Redlink GmbH > > m: +43 6602747925 > > e: sergio.fernan...@redlink.co > > w: http://redlink.co
