+1 switch as soon as possible, and then continue working on the data end. rgds jan i
On Sunday, June 21, 2015, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > Le dimanche 21 juin 2015 15:54:29 jan i a écrit : > > On 21 June 2015 at 15:48, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > On 2015-06-21 02:45, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > > >> for me, the new site is ready: there is of course room for > improvements, > > >> but > > >> it is stable and maintainable, waiting for contributions > > >> > > >> notice: I changed the wording to stop using "TLP", but use "Committee" > > >> instead, since TLP cause issues when trying to describe each projects > > >> (the > > >> software) as TLP or sub-projects > > >> > > >> > > >> when doing the switch, we'll need to rename current site as projects- > > >> old.apache.org: there is some content to migrate (DOAP, > documentation) > > >> associated to communication with projects on the changes that has to > be > > >> decoupled from public vizualisation. I'll continue working on it. > > >> > > >> There one choice to do: continue serving the pages from current VM or > > >> serve > > >> through standard resilient httpds. The VM is useful for cron jobs, > but is > > >> not > > >> absolutely necessary for serving content since I removed online > content > > >> editing that caused the VM requirement for content serving AFAIK. > Using > > >> standard httpd will avoid SPOF or eventual load issue. > > > > > > What do you mean by 'standard httpd'? It already uses...standard httpd > for > > > serving the site. > > > The cron jobs are needed for updating various statistics and data on > the > > > site, they can't just be shut off - they also power > reporter.apache.org. > > > > Maybe I misunderstood something, I understood that we are using httpd, > but > > in our own vm. In my opinion it would be nicer to use the www.a.o httpd > > (sorry > > vms have been changing lately so I am not sure where it runs), since that > > would put httpd maintenance on infra instead of comdev. > +1 > that was what I mean by "standard httpd" (ie not the binary but the > machines > where it runs) > > > > > > > I think the site is ready for a more prominent role, but I find this > > > discussion confusing, and I find it somewhat sad that we're gonna stick > > > with something as arcane as DOAP. > > > > +100 !! > > > > DOAP == Dead On Arrival Permanently :-) JSON == Jump Simply On New > > (but I know I am only 1 voice). > step by step, please: this will avoid confusion between independant topics > > switching without disturbing current conventions/knowledge is something > that > already takes a long time and energy: I know it because I put a lot of > energy > on it for a few monthes now! > > We started a discussion on this source format topic during april, and AFAIK > nobody worked on it. > > What I'd like now is to switch: we can discuss later on what we want to > change > (and communication to every comittees this requires). > With the new site, we'll be able to change formats if we want, the only > requirement is to have json files for the visualization > > > Regards, > > Hervé > > > > > rgds > > jan i. > > > > > With regards, > > > Daniel. > > > > > >> but definitely, the site is ready for the switch > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> Hervé > > >> > > >> Le vendredi 19 juin 2015 20:55:52 Sally Khudairi a écrit : > > >>> Hello Uli and the Apache ComDev team --I hope this message finds you > > >>> well. > > >>> Per below, I'm interested in promoting the new Projects page. > > >>> Can you please let me know if/when we're ready to do so? > > >>> Thanks so much, > > >>> Sally > > >>> > > >>> ----- Forwarded Message ----- > > >>> > > >>> From: David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us <javascript:;>> > > >>> > > >>> To: Sally Khudairi <sallykhuda...@yahoo.com <javascript:;>> > > >>> > > >>> Cc: Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org <javascript:;>>; ASF > Infrastructure > > >>> <infrastruct...@apache.org <javascript:;>> Sent: Friday, June 19, > 2015 11:50 AM > > >>> > > >>> Subject: Re: Is https://projects-new.apache.org/ ready for prime > time? > > >>> > > >>> Hi Sally: > > >>> > > >>> projects-new.apache.org is a ComDev managed resource, not an > > >>> infrastructure managed resource. I think the PMC has had a discussion > > >>> or two about when to migrate projects-new to projects.a.o > > >>> > > >>> --David > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Sally Khudairi > > >>> > > >>> <sallykhuda...@yahoo.com <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >>>> Hello Daniel and David --I hope you are both well. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> I was wondering if the new Projects page at > > >>>> > > >>>> https://projects-new.apache.org/ > > >>>> > > >>>> was ready to be publicly deployed/announced/promoted. > > >>>> > > >>>> There's so much great information there and it's an incredible > resource > > >>>> (I > > >>>> use it every week for the News Round-ups and we relied on it for the > > >>>> Annual Report), if there's no reason why it should still be in > stealth > > >>>> mode, I'd like to shout out about it from the rooftops. > > >>>> > > >>>> Just let me know if we're good to go and if there are any > > >>>> disclaimers/caveats we should be aware of. > > >>>> > > >>>> Warm thanks, > > >>>> Sally > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> = = = = = > > >>>> vox +1 617 921 8656 > > >>>> off2 +1 646 583 3362 > > >>>> skype sallykhudairi > > -- Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings.
