FYI， ApacheCon Asia conference website[1] uses Hugo with a customer theme[2].
[1]https://github.com/apache/apachecon-acasia [2]https://github.com/apache/apachecon-acasia/tree/master/themes/apachecon Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 7:35 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > it might be simpler to manage if we used this PMC instead - although > > > that requires some consensus from this PMC first to own something that > > > really belongs to conferences. > > > > Yeah. That's what I am really looking for :). I would also be fine to > create > a new group ? PMC? for that if ComDev is not the right place. Maybe there > are ways to set up other "entities" for the ASF structure that could serve > the purpose ? I do not (yet) know all the options - but I believe PMC is not > the only option to have a separate "LDAP group". > > > One note: do you *specifically* want to copy the ComDev site repo? Or > > > do you want to start with the infra-supported (but simpler design) > > > Not really. We can start from scratch, I was referring more to the > integrations > that we get from INFRA: .asf.yaml, emails sent to specific discussion lists > we > can customize - generally following best practices there. > > > > > My experience with both Hugo and Pelican is that Hugo is easier to > > customise. > > > > Yes we also prefer Hugo. Airflow Summit Website - prepared entirely by the > Software > Guru team - our producers - is based on Hugo, so that would be our > preference as well. > > https://github.com/softwareguru/airflowsummit-website > > > > > > > template repo they recommend for new projects? > > > https://github.com/apache/template-site > > > > I don't think that is production ready. > > > > We have quite a lot of time before our website will be public (at the very > least > 3-4 months), so we are ok to take it slowly, follow the right process, and > then > even contribute back and make them more ready - if that would be a good > start, > We are happy to do so. We could eventually also add an "ASF conference > template" > for others and possibly pave the way to follow the same "process" (but I am > usually > of the opinion that in order to make something reusable, you have to make > it usable > first - so that would likely be a next step and we could "lead by > example"). > > > > > > > > No. AFAIK any direct write access to /apache repos can only come from > > > ASF committers who have signed an ICLA. But that's solvable for a > > > special case like this, by having an officer or PMC simply agree to > > > invite those outside individuals at Software Guru to be committers here. > > > Note also that individuals can be made committers, not companies. > > > > > I believe signing ICLA by those individuals from Software Guru is not a > problem at all, > and they will be perfectly happy to act in their "individual" capacity. I > know them personally > very well and I am sure this is not a problem. And on a personal (about > individuals) note - > they are so much personally involved with other Apache conferences > (Airflow, Beam) > and now running the Community Over Code EU, that it would make absolutely > sense to make them committers. > > I think it's more of a question - if they are made committers in ComDev, > they will have > access to the main ASF community site, so possibly having a separate > "group"? makes > more sense. > > So I think the main question I have now - is it really possible to have it > in comdev? > > Or should we (any leads on how?) create a new "group" to manage it. > > J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@community.apache.org
