The FileTransferError body property is not implemented yet so that error
is fine.

The bugs blocking RC are:
- The compass ones are new, we should investigate
- The FileTransfer is not defined, which was a symbol mapping issue in the
JS (which is why all platforms need to grab the new JS test).

On 2/20/13 12:37 PM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Don't think these failures should block rc1, but on iOS, I'm getting that
>plus:
>
>Compass (navigator.compass) Compass Heading model (CompassHeading) should
>be able to create a new CompassHeading instance with no
>parameters.<file:///var/mobile/Applications/DC5AC5B0-AD05-4B67-884F-6D9A7F
>CE1D6D/250rc1.app/www/autotest/pages/all.html?spec=Compass%20(navigator.co
>mpass)%20Compass%20Heading%20model%20(CompassHeading)%20should%20be%20able
>%20to%20create%20a%20new%20CompassHeading%20instance%20with%20no%20paramet
>ers.>
>
>Expected undefined to be defined.
>
>Expected undefined to be defined.
>
>Expected undefined to be defined.
>
>FileTransfer download method should get response body on
>failure.<file:///var/mobile/Applications/DC5AC5B0-AD05-4B67-884F-6D9A7FCE1
>D6D/250rc1.app/www/autotest/pages/all.html?spec=FileTransfer%20download%20
>method%20should%20get%20response%20body%20on%20failure.>
>
>Expected null to equal 'You requested a 404'.
>
>-----------
>
>
>Will investigate
>
>
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Becky Gibson
><gibson.be...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On iOS I'm failing one of the compass tests:  CompassHeading should be
>>able
>> to create a new CompassHeading with no parameters.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > K I've updated the JS tag. Platforms should grab the latest 2.5.0rc1
>>tag
>> > from cordova-js and retag + retest.
>> >
>> > On 2/20/13 12:02 PM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Not clear (?) but I think so. I suppose all platforms get the new js
>>and
>> > >re-test, and re-tag.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> So the JS needs to be retagged ya?
>> > >>
>> > >> On 2/20/13 11:03 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >Not this time actually. This was a refactor in cordova-js where I
>> > >>forgot
>> > >> >to
>> > >> >"git add" the new files. It broke all existing tests.
>> > >> >
>> > >> >
>> > >> >On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michal Mocny
>><mmo...@chromium.org>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> >> Huzzah!
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> I take it you pushed mobile spec test changes without the
>> cordova-js
>> > >> >>code
>> > >> >> needed for them to pass?  This is the downside of multi-repo :(
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> -Michal
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve
>> > >> >><agri...@chromium.org>wrote:
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>> Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged them into
>>master
>> as
>> > >> >>>well.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms without these
>> files.
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve
>> > >><agri...@chromium.org>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>> > I think I've figured it out:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js (next) $ git
>>status
>> > >> >>> > # On branch next
>> > >> >>> > # Untracked files:
>> > >> >>> > #   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be
>> committed)
>> > >> >>> > #
>> > >> >>> > # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/
>> > >> >>> > # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/
>> > >> >>> > nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git
>> > >>add" to
>> > >> >>> > track)
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > Whoops!
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson <
>> > >> gibson.be...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >wrote:
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> For added data,  I also  fail using the tagged cordova-js
>> > >> >>> >> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) built locally.
>> > >> >>> >>
>> > >> >>> >>
>> > >> >>> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron
>><shaz...@gmail.com>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> >>
>> > >> >>> >> > I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1
>>(hash
>> > >> >>> >> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the
>>same
>> > >> >>>results
>> > >> >>> as
>> > >> >>> >> > I've always had :/
>> > >> >>> >> >
>> > >> >>> >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve
>> > >> >>><agri...@chromium.org
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine...
>> > >> >>> >> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron <
>> shaz...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > Could be the symbol mapping.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging --
>> > >> >>>window.FileTransfer
>> > >> >>> is
>> > >> >>> >> not
>> > >> >>> >> > > > defined, but I can do a
>> > >> >>> >> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
>> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron
>> > >><shaz...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on
>>iOS
>> > >> >>> 2.5.0rc1 it
>> > >> >>> >> > > still
>> > >> >>> >> > > > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec),
>>it
>> > >>all
>> > >> >>> >> passes. I
>> > >> >>> >> > > > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron
>> > >><shaz...@gmail.com
>> > >> >
>> > >> >>> >> wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of
>> iOS
>> > >>and
>> > >> >>> >> 2.5.0rc1
>> > >> >>> >> > > of
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same
>> > >>results
>> > >> >>> as I
>> > >> >>> >> had
>> > >> >>> >> > > > (both
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >> in Simulator and device as well).
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <
>> > >> >>> >> > agri...@chromium.org
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for
>>me
>> > >>(on
>> > >> >>> >> simulator)
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <
>> > >> >>> >> > > gibson.be...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > This morning I did   git pull apache next for
>> > >> >>>mobile-spec
>> > >> >>> and
>> > >> >>> >> got
>> > >> >>> >> > > > this:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Fast-forward
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  VERSION                              |  2 +-
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/file.tests.js         | 14
>> > >> >>>++++++++++----
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27
>> > >> >>> >> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  cordova.js                           |  2 +-
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  index.html                           |  1 +
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/index.html                      |  3 ++-
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/page2.html                      | 27
>> > >> >>> >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  splashscreen/index.html              | 47
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18
>> deletions(-)
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >  create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > Does that help?
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <
>> > >> >>> shaz...@gmail.com>
>> > >> >>> >> > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on
>>this
>> > >>yet.
>> > >> >>> Which
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson
>> > >>wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday
>> (using
>> > >>an
>> > >> >>> older
>> > >> >>> >> > > > version)
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> and
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > I
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is
>>with
>> > >>the
>> > >> >>> tests
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> themselves.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <
>> > >> >>> >> shaz...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then
>>copy :)
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal
>>Mocny
>> > >> >>>wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file
>> > >>output?
>> > >> >>>  Did
>> > >> >>> >> you
>> > >> >>> >> > > > open
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > remote
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output
>>manually?
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM,
>>Shazron <
>> > >> >>> >> > > shaz...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS
>>running
>> > >>6.0.1
>> > >> >>>(to
>> > >> >>> >> rule
>> > >> >>> >> > > out
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> any
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > errors
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > due
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same
>>number of
>> > >> >>>errors
>> > >> >>> as
>> > >> >>> >> the
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> previous
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > two
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > devices.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM,
>> Shazron <
>> > >> >>> >> > > > shaz...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are
>>22
>> > >> >>> mobile-spec
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> failures (21
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > related
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them
>> tomorrow
>> > >> >>>and
>> > >> >>> fix
>> > >> >>> >> > for a
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> re-tag.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > The
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached
>>as a
>> > >>text
>> > >> >>> file.
>> > >> >>> >> > > Tested
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> on an
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > iPhone 5
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS
>> > >>5.1.1,
>> > >> >>> exact
>> > >> >>> >> > same
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > failures.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM,
>>Herm
>> > >>Wong <
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>>kingoftheo...@hotmail.com<javascript:;><javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > From: shaz...@gmail.com
>> <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08
>> -0800
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > To:
>> > >>dev@cordova.apache.org<javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for
>> > >> >>>Eye-Oh-Ess,
>> > >> >>> >> > wrapping
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> things
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > up.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM,
>> Joe
>> > >> >>> Bowser <
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > bows...@gmail.com<javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process
>>with
>> > >>Fil.
>> > >> >>>  If
>> > >> >>> >> we
>> > >> >>> >> > > fail,
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> we
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > fail
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50
>>AM,
>> > >>Filip
>> > >> >>> Maj <
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > f...@adobe.com
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues
>>for
>> > >> >>>2.5.0rc1
>> > >> >>> >> > > tagging.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next"
>>branch
>> > >> >>>under
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> javascript
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > and
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > tagged
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I
>>did it
>> > >> >>>right
>> > >> >>> :s
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian
>> > >>LeRoux" <
>> > >> >>> >> > b...@brian.io
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim
>>to
>> > >>get
>> > >> >>>this
>> > >> >>> >> thing
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > tagged/bagged
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > today.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23
>> AM,
>> > >> >>>Filip
>> > >> >>> >> Maj <
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > f...@adobe.com<javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do
>> it.
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe
>> > >>Bowser" <
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> bows...@gmail.com
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work?
>>Do we
>> > >> >>>create
>> > >> >>> the
>> > >> >>> >> > next
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> branch
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > now
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > and
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> throw
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>> >
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >>
>> > >> >>> >> > > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > > >
>> > >> >>> >> > >
>> > >> >>> >> >
>> > >> >>> >>
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>> >
>> > >> >>>
>> > >> >>
>> > >> >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>

Reply via email to