Not this time actually. This was a refactor in cordova-js where I forgot to
"git add" the new files. It broke all existing tests.


On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> wrote:

> Huzzah!
>
> I take it you pushed mobile spec test changes without the cordova-js code
> needed for them to pass?  This is the downside of multi-repo :(
>
> -Michal
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:33 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Okay, checked them into next branch, and merged them into master as well.
>>
>> Likely filetransfer is broken on all platforms without these files.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I think I've figured it out:
>> >
>> > agrieve@agrieve-macbookpro ~/git/cordova-js (next) $ git status
>> > # On branch next
>> > # Untracked files:
>> > #   (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
>> > #
>> > # lib/common/plugin/filetransfer/
>> > # lib/windowsphone/plugin/filetransfer/
>> > nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to
>> > track)
>> >
>> > Whoops!
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Becky Gibson <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> For added data,  I also  fail using the tagged cordova-js
>> >> (04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) built locally.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I just generated the js from cordova-js on tag 2.5.0rc1 (hash
>> >> > 04e4ceafdcd59cdd937e873cc9006766c1e5940a) and I get the same results
>> as
>> >> > I've always had :/
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Using the JS built from cordova-js it's working fine...
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Shazron <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > Could be the symbol mapping.
>> >> > > > Using Safari 6 iPhone Simulator debugging -- window.FileTransfer
>> is
>> >> not
>> >> > > > defined, but I can do a
>> >> cordova.require("cordova/plugin/FileTransfer").
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Shazron <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > > Don't know what's wrong - with mob-spec 3e3d075 on iOS
>> 2.5.0rc1 it
>> >> > > still
>> >> > > > > all fails. Trying iOS 2.4.0 (with latest mob-spec), it all
>> >> passes. I
>> >> > > > > suspect its in the cordova-js, not mob-spec
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Shazron <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > >> Andrew, I re-verified and re-downloaded 2.5.0rc1 of iOS and
>> >> 2.5.0rc1
>> >> > > of
>> >> > > > >> mobile-spec, created a new project - I get the same results
>> as I
>> >> had
>> >> > > > (both
>> >> > > > >> in Simulator and device as well).
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andrew Grieve <
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > > > >wrote:
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> Just tried the tests and they are all passing for me (on
>> >> simulator)
>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Becky Gibson <
>> >> > > [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> >wrote:
>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> > This morning I did   git pull apache next for mobile-spec
>> and
>> >> got
>> >> > > > this:
>> >> > > > >>> > Updating 3e3d075..842e603
>> >> > > > >>> > Fast-forward
>> >> > > > >>> >  VERSION                              |  2 +-
>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/file.tests.js         | 14 ++++++++++----
>> >> > > > >>> >  autotest/tests/filetransfer.tests.js | 27
>> >> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++------
>> >> > > > >>> >  cordova.js                           |  2 +-
>> >> > > > >>> >  index.html                           |  1 +
>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/index.html                      |  3 ++-
>> >> > > > >>> >  misc/page2.html                      | 27
>> >> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> >> > > > >>> >  splashscreen/index.html              | 47
>> >> > > > >>> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >> > > > >>> >  8 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>> >> > > > >>> >  create mode 100644 splashscreen/index.html
>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > > > >>> > Does that help?
>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > > > >>> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Shazron <
>> [email protected]>
>> >> > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > > > >>> > > That was my suspicion but i have no data on this yet.
>> Which
>> >> > > > >>> > > mob-spec version? I can verify.
>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Becky Gibson wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > Just an FYI - I ran mobile-spec yesterday (using an
>> older
>> >> > > > version)
>> >> > > > >>> and
>> >> > > > >>> > I
>> >> > > > >>> > > > only had one failure so maybe the issue is with the
>> tests
>> >> > > > >>> themselves.
>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Shazron <
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On iOS just touch and hold, drag then copy :)
>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > On Wednesday, February 20, 2013, Michal Mocny wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > Shaz how did you generate that text file output?
>>  Did
>> >> you
>> >> > > > open
>> >> > > > >>> > remote
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > inspector and copy console output manually?
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Shazron <
>> >> > > [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > Tried mob-spec on an iPhone 3GS running 6.0.1 (to
>> >> rule
>> >> > > out
>> >> > > > >>> any
>> >> > > > >>> > > errors
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > due
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to the new 6.1.2 update) - same number of errors
>> as
>> >> the
>> >> > > > >>> previous
>> >> > > > >>> > > two
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > devices.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Shazron <
>> >> > > > [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > I tagged iOS 2.5.0rc1 but there are 22
>> mobile-spec
>> >> > > > >>> failures (21
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > related
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > to
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > filetransfer). I'll examine them tomorrow and
>> fix
>> >> > for a
>> >> > > > >>> re-tag.
>> >> > > > >>> > > The
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > mobile-spec failures are attached as a text
>> file.
>> >> > > Tested
>> >> > > > >>> on an
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > iPhone 5
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > with iOS 6.1.2 and iPhone 4 with iOS 5.1.1,
>> exact
>> >> > same
>> >> > > > >>> > failures.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Herm Wong <
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > [email protected]<javascript:;><javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> webOS has been tagged 2.5.0rc1.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > From: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>> >> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:46:08 -0800
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Subject: Re: Tag 2.5.0rc1?
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > To: [email protected] <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > Will do the same EOD today for Eye-Oh-Ess,
>> >> > wrapping
>> >> > > > >>> things
>> >> > > > >>> > up.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Joe
>> Bowser <
>> >> > > > >>> > > [email protected]<javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > Gone through the same process with Fil.
>>  If
>> >> we
>> >> > > fail,
>> >> > > > >>> we
>> >> > > > >>> > fail
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> together!!!!
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Filip
>> Maj <
>> >> > > > >>> > [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > I've creatd the JIRA issues for 2.5.0rc1
>> >> > > tagging.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > Also created a new "next" branch under
>> the
>> >> > > > >>> javascript
>> >> > > > >>> > and
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > tagged
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> 2.5.0rc1
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > from that branch.. Hope I did it right
>> :s
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > On 2/19/13 11:32 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <
>> >> > [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>Sounds about right. Lets aim to get this
>> >> thing
>> >> > > > >>> > > tagged/bagged
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > today.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Filip
>> >> Maj <
>> >> > > > >>> > > [email protected]<javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> I fear change! But let's do it.
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> On 2/19/13 11:19 AM, "Joe Bowser" <
>> >> > > > >>> [email protected]
>> >> > > > >>> > > <javascript:;>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > <javascript:;>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > wrote:
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >So, how does this work? Do we create
>> the
>> >> > next
>> >> > > > >>> branch
>> >> > > > >>> > > now
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > and
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> throw
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>> >things in that?
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > > >
>> >> > > > >>> > >
>> >> > > > >>> >
>> >> > > > >>>
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >>
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to