Yeah Michal, That is the exact use case I had in mind. When we were a startup we couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all our contract work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to compile.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > Very interesting. Combined with Bradens proposal to support pointing to a > local platform, looks very good. > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support on a given > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux box through > Ripple. > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use case vs lazy load > > vendoring > > > > caching could be a future thing > > > > might be a really nice path > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to add a platform to a > project > > even if we don't have the build dependencies. > > > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is still usable if we can't > > build/deploy > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions. It was mentioned in > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement that ./serve goes away > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command. But lets discuss. (Just > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.) > > >
