HI GUYS! I'm reviving this thread :)
There are a couple of issues filed for both CLI commands `ripple` and `serve`. We've spoke in the past about axing `serve` in favor of `ripple` (see below in this thread). My suggestion: remove `serve` altogether in 3.0. There was consensus for this before but just wanted to loop back with folks to make sure this sounded alright. Serve seems to be completely abandoned: the tests are currently disabled (and not passing), so I am in favor of closing the serve-related issues as won't fix and suggesting people employ `cordova ripple` instead. On 3/23/13 7:15 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <[email protected]> wrote: >https://uwaterloo.ca/engineering/events/first-robotics-waterloo-regional > >I was a score keeper last year (two years ago?) and it was super cool. > > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> Dan, my brother showed me this (he is mechatronics student at UW). Is >>it >> still on tomorrow? >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Dan Silivestru >><[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > Sorry I'm late to the game, I was judging frisbee throwing, pyramid >> > climbing robots all day :-) >> > >> > https://twitter.com/confusement/status/315162754619162625 >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > K lets try to land it in 2.6.0rc1. There is still time Gord! >> Blackberry + >> > > iOS not tagged yet so we can land some more commits in cordova-cli >> > > >> > > On 3/22/13 3:02 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > >Like that plan. Say we proceed and land it in 2.6 to feel out. >> > > > >> > > >On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> I'm fine with removing server. In my mind ripple is just a serve >> > command >> > > >> on steroids. At this morning's meeting I believe some of the >> Googlers >> > > >> expressed concerns about axing out serve, so perhaps a prudent >>first >> > > >>step >> > > >> would be to add Ripple as an `emulate` command and then we can >>take >> > baby >> > > >> steps to extract out serve over the coming weeks. >> > > >> >> > > >> On 3/22/13 2:45 PM, "Gord Tanner" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>>Ripple is now ready to be integrated, currently I have it added >>as a >> > > >>>seperate ripple command in a personal branch [1] >> > > >>> >> > > >>>Most of the work on Ripple was a much needed feature we knew we >> needed >> > > >>>(Device Selection via query string [2]) as well as adding the >> ability >> > to >> > > >>>serve content from multiple directories [3] (to support www/ >>merged >> > with >> > > >>>platform/www/). >> > > >>> >> > > >>>Should I do the full remove serve and add this to emulate or >>merge >> > this >> > > >>>in >> > > >>>as is? (maybe remove serve in the meantime) >> > > >>> >> > > >>>[1] - https://github.com/gtanner/cordova-cli/tree/ripple >> > > >>>[2] - >> > > >>> >> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd >> > > >>>if >> > > >>>f;h=b36213d426700a3cc62b4701bc75806ff8539528 >> > > >>>[3] - >> > > >>> >> > > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ripple.git;a=commitd >> > > >>>if >> > > >>>f;h=2e483836bc5a24397ed002556f4209fac9508438 >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>>On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Michal Mocny >><[email protected]> >> > > >>>wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> Thats awesome ;) >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner >><[email protected]> >> > > >>>>wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> > Yeah Michal, >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > That is the exact use case I had in mind. When we were a >> startup >> > we >> > > >>>> > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all >>our >> > > >>>>contract >> > > >>>> > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to >>compile. >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny < >> > [email protected]> >> > > >>>> wrote: >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> > > Very interesting. Combined with Bradens proposal to >>support >> > > >>>>pointing >> > > >>>> to >> > > >>>> > a >> > > >>>> > > local platform, looks very good. >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support >>on >> a >> > > >>>>given >> > > >>>> > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux >>box >> > > >>>>through >> > > >>>> > > Ripple. >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use case >>vs >> > lazy >> > > >>>>load >> > > >>>> > > > vendoring >> > > >>>> > > > >> > > >>>> > > > caching could be a future thing >> > > >>>> > > > >> > > >>>> > > > might be a really nice path >> > > >>>> > > > >> > > >>>> > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner >> > > >>>><[email protected]> >> > > >>>> > wrote: >> > > >>>> > > > > +1 >> > > >>>> > > > > >> > > >>>> > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to add a >> platform >> > > >>>>to a >> > > >>>> > > project >> > > >>>> > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies. >> > > >>>> > > > > >> > > >>>> > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is still >>usable if >> > we >> > > >>>>can't >> > > >>>> > > > build/deploy >> > > >>>> > > > > >> > > >>>> > > > > Sent from my iPhone >> > > >>>> > > > > >> > > >>>> > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >>>> > > > > >> > > >>>> > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions. It >>was >> > > >>>>mentioned >> > > >>>> in >> > > >>>> > > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement that >> ./serve >> > > >>>>goes >> > > >>>> > away >> > > >>>> > > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command. But lets >> > > >>>>discuss. >> > > >>>> (Just >> > > >>>> > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.) >> > > >>>> > > > >> > > >>>> > > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Dan Silivestru >> > +1 (519) 589-3624 >> > >>
