Thats awesome ;)
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah Michal, > > That is the exact use case I had in mind. When we were a startup we > couldn't afford mac's so just used linux and ripple for all our contract > work and borrowed a friends macbook when we needed to compile. > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Very interesting. Combined with Bradens proposal to support pointing to > a > > local platform, looks very good. > > > > Also note, offline isn't the only reason, platform support on a given > > machine as well: ie, can "test" iPhone (sorta) on a linux box through > > Ripple. > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > omg I just realized this would fulfill offline use case vs lazy load > > > vendoring > > > > > > caching could be a future thing > > > > > > might be a really nice path > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > With this I would want to add the ability to add a platform to a > > project > > > even if we don't have the build dependencies. > > > > > > > > Emulate would just default to ripple so is still usable if we can't > > > build/deploy > > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > On 2013-03-22, at 1:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > > > > > >> I think this bleeds back into other discussions. It was mentioned in > > > >> the call earlier. I think some tacit agreement that ./serve goes > away > > > >> and Ripple is the default ./emulate command. But lets discuss. (Just > > > >> this. Lets keep thread focused.) > > > > > >
