cordova-kink PROS: would probably get lots of downloads in the app store
CONS: would probably not get accepted into the app store On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > I like the kinky version. > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> Heh, DX sounds *very* Adobe. (Remember Flash MX?) Meanwhile Devtool >> sounds very Google. >> >> Either way I like both more than calling it a harness. ;) >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> > Awesome! >> > >> > Yep - it's editable so that you can edit it :) >> > >> > I like Cordova DX, or maybe "Cordova DevTool" >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Michael Brooks < >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hey Andrew, >> >> >> >> This is exactly what I had planned as well. It's as if we read each >> >> other's >> >> minds. >> >> >> >> I'll go through the document a second time and add some comments. Do you >> >> mind if I edit the document? >> >> >> >> What is this thing going to be called? cordova-app-harness sounds kinky. >> >> >> >> >> >> For naming, my stance has been the Cordova App. There is no reason to >> make >> >> it complicated. If the app stores, users would install Cordova. If you >> >> think this is confusing users with downloading the Cordova framework >> >> (which >> >> they sort of are), then call it "Cordova DX" (DX is developer >> experience). >> >> >> >> Michael >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Looks great Andrew. I'd add Ripple and device mirroring as part of >> >> > this. (More than one device navigates in concert.) >> >> > >> >> > What is this thing going to be called? cordova-app-harness sounds >> kinky. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> >> >> > wrote: >> >> > > Hey Michael (and anyone else interested), >> >> > > >> >> > > I've written up a requirements doc for this: >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14LG1IiEiQ9npc2RmPo5_UEKQTfsg-3ivJu7R2iPBmsw/edit?usp=sharing >> >> > > >> >> > > It's a bit biased towards hosting Chrome Apps, but I think the >> >> > > majority >> >> > of >> >> > > the app will be generic. The chrome bits will be implemented as a >> >> > > combination of extra plugins that are installed in, and some UI >> >> > > tweaks. >> >> > > >> >> > > Would definitely love feedback to know if this describes the same >> type >> >> > > of >> >> > > thing you were thinking of. Shravan will likely be starting on this >> >> > > this >> >> > > week. >> >> > >> > >> > >>
