haha, so Harness it is? ;) On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> cordova-kink > > PROS: > would probably get lots of downloads in the app store > > CONS: > would probably not get accepted into the app store > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> > wrote: > > I like the kinky version. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > > > >> Heh, DX sounds *very* Adobe. (Remember Flash MX?) Meanwhile Devtool > >> sounds very Google. > >> > >> Either way I like both more than calling it a harness. ;) > >> > >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> > >> wrote: > >> > Awesome! > >> > > >> > Yep - it's editable so that you can edit it :) > >> > > >> > I like Cordova DX, or maybe "Cordova DevTool" > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Michael Brooks < > >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hey Andrew, > >> >> > >> >> This is exactly what I had planned as well. It's as if we read each > >> >> other's > >> >> minds. > >> >> > >> >> I'll go through the document a second time and add some comments. Do > you > >> >> mind if I edit the document? > >> >> > >> >> What is this thing going to be called? cordova-app-harness sounds > kinky. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> For naming, my stance has been the Cordova App. There is no reason to > >> make > >> >> it complicated. If the app stores, users would install Cordova. If > you > >> >> think this is confusing users with downloading the Cordova framework > >> >> (which > >> >> they sort of are), then call it "Cordova DX" (DX is developer > >> experience). > >> >> > >> >> Michael > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > Looks great Andrew. I'd add Ripple and device mirroring as part of > >> >> > this. (More than one device navigates in concert.) > >> >> > > >> >> > What is this thing going to be called? cordova-app-harness sounds > >> kinky. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Andrew Grieve < > agri...@chromium.org> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > Hey Michael (and anyone else interested), > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I've written up a requirements doc for this: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/14LG1IiEiQ9npc2RmPo5_UEKQTfsg-3ivJu7R2iPBmsw/edit?usp=sharing > >> >> > > > >> >> > > It's a bit biased towards hosting Chrome Apps, but I think the > >> >> > > majority > >> >> > of > >> >> > > the app will be generic. The chrome bits will be implemented as a > >> >> > > combination of extra plugins that are installed in, and some UI > >> >> > > tweaks. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Would definitely love feedback to know if this describes the same > >> type > >> >> > > of > >> >> > > thing you were thinking of. Shravan will likely be starting on > this > >> >> > > this > >> >> > > week. > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >
