That's great news! Thanks for chiming in Ken and Bryan!

I won't ask for a specific date, or hold you to it, but do you have a loose
timeframe in mind? I'm wondering how much love I should be giving our
existing codebase.

If the delay from making your implementation public is engineering-related,
is it possible our BB team could have a look at the code, so we can be
prepped on release? I would really like to get a feel for where you boys
are taking it. Is it currently in a private GitHub repo?


- Lorin



On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Bryan Higgins <bhigg...@blackberry.com>wrote:

> I think cataloguing the test failures for BB10 in JIRA is still a useful
> exercise. Like Gord mentioned, our prototype will have close to the same
> level support as the existing repo, but we plan to actively work on getting
> close to 100% pass rate. Once we get our code public, I'll send an overview
> out to the list for discussion. Ideally we'd like to contribute it all into
> Apache.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Ken Wallis <kwal...@blackberry.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the hold up guys. The dev team is pushing hard to get those
> > particular GitHub repos opened ASAP so we can openly discuss it, and get
> > that code moved in. A couple more things to check off and we will be good
> > to go.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Sent from my BlackBerry Z10 smartphone.
> > From: Lorin Beer
> > Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2013 7:02 AM
> > To: dev
> > Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: BB10 and JIRA Etiquette
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I've heard rumours of the ull rewrite, but until they actually
> start
> > showing their code and getting involved in the list discussion, I'm
> > pretending like we should proceed with BB10 dev on our end as normal.
> >
> > Gord, any word on a timeframe for their involvement/contribution with
> > Apache Cordova?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:43 AM, Gord Tanner <gtan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > The BlackBerry team has said on this list that they are rewriting
> > > everything for BlackBerry 10. They haven't shared any of the code yet
> but
> > > have warned that it is a complete rewrite. I am expecting it to be
> about
> > > the same support (or more).
> > >
> > > I think the issues are still valid as I can't imagine much changing
> when
> > > they rewrite everything.
> > >
> > > BlackBerry can chime in with more information.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Lorin Beer <lorin.beer....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've started cataloguing the failing tests and missing functionality
> on
> > > > BB10.
> > > > There's about 50 failing tests, and many more missing features (minor
> > and
> > > > major).
> > > >
> > > > What I'm wondering is this:
> > > > 1. dump all the issues in jira as I find them
> > > > or
> > > > 2. report the issues as I get an opportunity to fix them
> > > >
> > > > given the number of failing tests and issues, it would be some months
> > > > before I could get around to fixing all of them.
> > > >
> > > > On one hand, we get these issues documented so users see were aware
> of
> > > it,
> > > > and can indicate what they need fixed, not to mention encouraging
> > others
> > > to
> > > > take on some of these issues.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, it'll bloat our issue count. :)
> > > >
> > > > Wondering what the best approach is.
> > > >
> > > > - Lorin
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential
> > information, privileged material (including material protected by the
> > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute
> non-public
> > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the
> intended
> > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,
> > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from
> > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this
> > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be
> unlawful.
> >
>

Reply via email to