Never mind me dum dum. Thanks Jesse
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, > the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file is > correct. > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... >> I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x >> >> My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there >> wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js >> plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in >> iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. >> >> @purplecabbage >> risingj.com >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > >> > > Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. >> > > >> > > I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. >> > > >> > > On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > >I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a >> few >> > > >minutes to verify. >> > > > >> > > >@purplecabbage >> > > >risingj.com >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. >> > > >> >> > > >> Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on >> windows >> > > >> phone * >> > > >> >> > > >> On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> >Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not >> > > >>guaranteed, >> > > >> >and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ >> between >> > > >>the 2 >> > > >> >methods. >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best >> > > >>approach >> > > >> >is: >> > > >> >1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json >> > > >> >2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which >> case >> > it >> > > >> >continues on to a script injection attempt. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >@purplecabbage >> > > >> >risingj.com >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson >> > > >> ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> JSON files are not valid Javascript code. >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does >> the >> > > >> >>extension >> > > >> >> > have to be .js? >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for >> me. >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >@purplecabbage >> > > >> >> > >risingj.com >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson >> > > >> >> > ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both >> > > >> >> > >>cordova_plugins.js >> > > >> >> > >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while. >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> Braden >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson < >> > > >> >> > bra...@chromium.org >> > > >> >> > >> >wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the >> > file >> > > >> >> Plugman >> > > >> >> > >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very >> careful to >> > > >>be >> > > >> >> using >> > > >> >> > >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me >> about >> > > >>this; >> > > >> >>the >> > > >> >> > >> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. >> It's >> > > >>hard >> > > >> >>to >> > > >> >> > >>make >> > > >> >> > >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know >> which >> > > >> >>version >> > > >> >> > >>of >> > > >> >> > >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas >> here? >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Braden >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj < >> f...@adobe.com> >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't >> work on >> > > >> >>Windows >> > > >> >> > >> Phone >> > > >> >> > >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The >> > workaround >> > > >> >>that >> > > >> >> > >>Jesse >> > > >> >> > >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can >> compare >> > > >>it to >> > > >> >> > >> apache's >> > > >> >> > >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script >> tag >> > > >> >>pointing >> > > >> >> to >> > > >> >> > >> the >> > > >> >> > >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The >> XHR >> > > >> >> approach >> > > >> >> > >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we >> > need >> > > >>to >> > > >> >> > >>include >> > > >> >> > >> >> this bit of functionality. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >I'm still testing >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 >> > > >> >> > >>that I >> > > >> >> > >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, >> I'll >> > > >>get >> > > >> >>to >> > > >> >> all >> > > >> >> > >> the >> > > >> >> > >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had >> > > >>changes >> > > >> >>so I >> > > >> >> > >>can >> > > >> >> > >> >> get >> > > >> >> > >> >> >that done. >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj < >> f...@adobe.com >> > > >> > > >> >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS >> > > >>assigned >> > > >> >>to >> > > >> >> > >>me. I >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>will >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" < >> wjamesj...@gmail.com> >> > > >> >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a >> couple >> > of >> > > >>the >> > > >> >> ones >> > > >> >> > >> Shaz >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >-James Jong >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve < >> > > >> >> agri...@chromium.org >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / >> FileTransfer) >> > > >>(e.g. >> > > >> >> > >>cb-3185) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between >> > > >>Android >> > > >> >> and >> > > >> >> > >>iOS >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>(Jesse >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I >> think) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some >> > > >> >> > >> Plugin-behaving-nicely >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>checks >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin >> > > >>takes >> > > >> >> spends >> > > >> >> > >> more >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>than >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) >> > > >>thread. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 >> weeks, >> > > >>and >> > > >> >>so I >> > > >> >> > >> >> clearly >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>won't >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so >> that we >> > > >>can >> > > >> >> focus >> > > >> >> > >> more >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>on >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our >> > release-foo >> > > >> >>some >> > > >> >> > >>more, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>and >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool >> > > >>(Steven >> > > >> >>- >> > > >> >> I'm >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>looking >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>at >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P). >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj >> > > >><f...@adobe.com >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff! >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" >> > > >> >> > >><jheif...@blackberry.com> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. >> Check >> > > >>out >> > > >> >> > >>CB-3797, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799 >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <f...@adobe.com >> > >> > > >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on >> issues >> > > >> >> anywhere? >> > > >> >> > >>I'd >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>like >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>to >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're >> > > >> >>speaking >> > > >> >> of. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" >> > > >> >> > >><br...@bryanhiggins.net> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the >> > > >>environment >> > > >> >> > >>settings >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>from >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> project >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should have >> it >> > > >> >>tested >> > > >> >> and >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>committed >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland >> > > >> >> > >> >> >><iclell...@google.com >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this >> morning >> > > >>that >> > > >> >> could >> > > >> >> > >> be a >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to >> > FileWriter.write(Blob) >> > > >> >>that >> > > >> >> > >>will >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>accept >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>a >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native Blob >> > > >>object. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new >> for >> > > >>2.9) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I >> > can >> > > >> >>take >> > > >> >> > >>care >> > > >> >> > >> of >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>it >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in >> this >> > > >> >>morning. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj >> > > >> >> > >><f...@adobe.com> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any >> objections? >> > > >> >>Anyone >> > > >> >> > >>still >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> on >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in >> for >> > > >>2.9? >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" < >> > > >> >> > >> >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron < >> > > >> >> > >> shaz...@gmail.com >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to >> > tackle: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 >> > > >>(to >> > > >> >> fix) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 >> > > >>(to >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>investigate, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> no >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 >> > > >> >>(there >> > > >> >> > >>is a >> > > >> >> > >> >> PR >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>to >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562(fix >> > > >> >> in >> > > >> >> > >>the >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> issue, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> to >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534(the >> > > >> >> > >> reporter >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>has >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> an >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe >> > fix) >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin >> Beer >> > < >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer....@gmail.com >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be >> > > >> >>resolved? >> > > >> >> I >> > > >> >> > >>am >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>aware >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> of a >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. >> Anything >> > > >>else >> > > >> >> you >> > > >> >> > >> want >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>in? >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron >> > > >> >> > >> >> >><shaz...@gmail.com> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more >> velocity >> > in >> > > >> >>the >> > > >> >> > >>iOS / >> > > >> >> > >> OS >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>X >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being >> away at >> > > >>WWDC >> > > >> >> this >> > > >> >> > >> >> week, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> but if >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a feather. >> > Will >> > > >> >>try >> > > >> >> to >> > > >> >> > >>get >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>more >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin >> Beer >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer....@gmail.com >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip >> > Maj >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <f...@adobe.com> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1! >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" >> > > >> >> > >><bows...@gmail.com> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but how >> > does >> > > >>a >> > > >> >> > >>2.9.0rc1 >> > > >> >> > >> on >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound? >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a >> > hardening >> > > >> >> release >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the RCs. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> >>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > >>>>>>>>-- >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) >> may >> > > >> >>contain >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>confidential >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including >> > material >> > > >> >> > >>protected >> > > >> >> > >> by >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>the >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable >> privileges), >> > or >> > > >> >> > >>constitute >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this >> information >> > > >>by >> > > >> >> anyone >> > > >> >> > >> >> other >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>than >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you >> have >> > > >> >>received >> > > >> >> > >>this >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately reply >> to >> > > >>the >> > > >> >> sender >> > > >> >> > >> and >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>delete >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, >> > > >>dissemination, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>distribution, >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>or >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended >> > > >> >>recipients >> > > >> >> is >> > > >> >> > >> not >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful. >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >
