Late to the game here, but to re-tag JS: ./cordova-coho/coho tag-release --version 2.9.0rc1 -r js
To update JS snapshots in all repos, coho can't handle that yet. I think I'll break updating of JS out into its own command so that we can address this usecase. On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Never mind me dum dum. Thanks Jesse > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah I'm stalled on this one. If I run jake on cordova-js 2.9.x branch, > > the version in the .js header is still 2.7.0 - checked the VERSION file > is > > correct. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... > >> I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x > >> > >> My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but > there > >> wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js > >> plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case > in > >> iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. > >> > >> @purplecabbage > >> risingj.com > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. > >> > > > >> > > I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. > >> > > > >> > > On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > >I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me > a > >> few > >> > > >minutes to verify. > >> > > > > >> > > >@purplecabbage > >> > > >risingj.com > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on > >> windows > >> > > >> phone * > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not > >> > > >>guaranteed, > >> > > >> >and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ > >> between > >> > > >>the 2 > >> > > >> >methods. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best > >> > > >>approach > >> > > >> >is: > >> > > >> >1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json > >> > > >> >2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which > >> case > >> > it > >> > > >> >continues on to a script injection attempt. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >@purplecabbage > >> > > >> >risingj.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson > >> > > >> ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> JSON files are not valid Javascript code. > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does > >> the > >> > > >> >>extension > >> > > >> >> > have to be .js? > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works > for > >> me. > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > >@purplecabbage > >> > > >> >> > >risingj.com > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson > >> > > >> >> > ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both > >> > > >> >> > >>cordova_plugins.js > >> > > >> >> > >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while. > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> Braden > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson < > >> > > >> >> > bra...@chromium.org > >> > > >> >> > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of > the > >> > file > >> > > >> >> Plugman > >> > > >> >> > >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very > >> careful to > >> > > >>be > >> > > >> >> using > >> > > >> >> > >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me > >> about > >> > > >>this; > >> > > >> >>the > >> > > >> >> > >> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. > >> It's > >> > > >>hard > >> > > >> >>to > >> > > >> >> > >>make > >> > > >> >> > >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know > >> which > >> > > >> >>version > >> > > >> >> > >>of > >> > > >> >> > >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas > >> here? > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > Braden > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj < > >> f...@adobe.com> > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't > >> work on > >> > > >> >>Windows > >> > > >> >> > >> Phone > >> > > >> >> > >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The > >> > workaround > >> > > >> >>that > >> > > >> >> > >>Jesse > >> > > >> >> > >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can > >> compare > >> > > >>it to > >> > > >> >> > >> apache's > >> > > >> >> > >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script > >> tag > >> > > >> >>pointing > >> > > >> >> to > >> > > >> >> > >> the > >> > > >> >> > >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. > The > >> XHR > >> > > >> >> approach > >> > > >> >> > >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think > we > >> > need > >> > > >>to > >> > > >> >> > >>include > >> > > >> >> > >> >> this bit of functionality. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> [1] > >> https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >I'm still testing > >> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 > >> > > >> >> > >>that I > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, > >> I'll > >> > > >>get > >> > > >> >>to > >> > > >> >> all > >> > > >> >> > >> the > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had > >> > > >>changes > >> > > >> >>so I > >> > > >> >> > >>can > >> > > >> >> > >> >> get > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >that done. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj < > >> f...@adobe.com > >> > > > >> > > >> >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS > >> > > >>assigned > >> > > >> >>to > >> > > >> >> > >>me. I > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>will > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" < > >> wjamesj...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a > >> couple > >> > of > >> > > >>the > >> > > >> >> ones > >> > > >> >> > >> Shaz > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >-James Jong > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve < > >> > > >> >> agri...@chromium.org > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, > namely: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel MuiƱo (Camera / > >> FileTransfer) > >> > > >>(e.g. > >> > > >> >> > >>cb-3185) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency > between > >> > > >>Android > >> > > >> >> and > >> > > >> >> > >>iOS > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>(Jesse > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I > >> think) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some > >> > > >> >> > >> Plugin-behaving-nicely > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>checks > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a > plugin > >> > > >>takes > >> > > >> >> spends > >> > > >> >> > >> more > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>than > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for > Android) > >> > > >>thread. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 > >> weeks, > >> > > >>and > >> > > >> >>so I > >> > > >> >> > >> >> clearly > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>won't > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so > >> that we > >> > > >>can > >> > > >> >> focus > >> > > >> >> > >> more > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>on > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our > >> > release-foo > >> > > >> >>some > >> > > >> >> > >>more, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>and > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho > tool > >> > > >>(Steven > >> > > >> >>- > >> > > >> >> I'm > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>looking > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>at > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P). > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj > >> > > >><f...@adobe.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff! > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" > >> > > >> >> > >><jheif...@blackberry.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. > >> Check > >> > > >>out > >> > > >> >> > >>CB-3797, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799 > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" < > f...@adobe.com > >> > > >> > > >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on > >> issues > >> > > >> >> anywhere? > >> > > >> >> > >>I'd > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>like > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>to > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature > you're > >> > > >> >>speaking > >> > > >> >> of. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" > >> > > >> >> > >><br...@bryanhiggins.net> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the > >> > > >>environment > >> > > >> >> > >>settings > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>from > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> project > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should > have > >> it > >> > > >> >>tested > >> > > >> >> and > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>committed > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian > Clelland > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >><iclell...@google.com > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this > >> morning > >> > > >>that > >> > > >> >> could > >> > > >> >> > >> be a > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to > >> > FileWriter.write(Blob) > >> > > >> >>that > >> > > >> >> > >>will > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>accept > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>a > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native > Blob > >> > > >>object. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new > >> for > >> > > >>2.9) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, > then I > >> > can > >> > > >> >>take > >> > > >> >> > >>care > >> > > >> >> > >> of > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>it > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in > >> this > >> > > >> >>morning. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj > >> > > >> >> > >><f...@adobe.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any > >> objections? > >> > > >> >>Anyone > >> > > >> >> > >>still > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> on > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in > >> for > >> > > >>2.9? > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" < > >> > > >> >> > >> >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, > Shazron < > >> > > >> >> > >> shaz...@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to > >> > tackle: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 > >> > > >>(to > >> > > >> >> fix) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 > >> > > >>(to > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>investigate, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> no > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 > >> > > >> >>(there > >> > > >> >> > >>is a > >> > > >> >> > >> >> PR > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>to > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562(fix > >> > > >> >> in > >> > > >> >> > >>the > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> issue, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> to > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534(the > >> > > >> >> > >> reporter > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>has > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> an > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and > maybe > >> > fix) > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin > >> Beer > >> > < > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer....@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to > be > >> > > >> >>resolved? > >> > > >> >> I > >> > > >> >> > >>am > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>aware > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> of a > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. > >> Anything > >> > > >>else > >> > > >> >> you > >> > > >> >> > >> want > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>in? > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, > Shazron > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >><shaz...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more > >> velocity > >> > in > >> > > >> >>the > >> > > >> >> > >>iOS / > >> > > >> >> > >> OS > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>X > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being > >> away at > >> > > >>WWDC > >> > > >> >> this > >> > > >> >> > >> >> week, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> but if > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a > feather. > >> > Will > >> > > >> >>try > >> > > >> >> to > >> > > >> >> > >>get > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>more > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin > >> Beer > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer....@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, > Jesse > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, > Filip > >> > Maj > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <f...@adobe.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1! > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" > >> > > >> >> > >><bows...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but > how > >> > does > >> > > >>a > >> > > >> >> > >>2.9.0rc1 > >> > > >> >> > >> on > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound? > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a > >> > hardening > >> > > >> >> release > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the > RCs. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > >>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >>>>>>>>-- > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) > >> may > >> > > >> >>contain > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>confidential > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including > >> > material > >> > > >> >> > >>protected > >> > > >> >> > >> by > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>the > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable > >> privileges), > >> > or > >> > > >> >> > >>constitute > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this > >> information > >> > > >>by > >> > > >> >> anyone > >> > > >> >> > >> >> other > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>than > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you > >> have > >> > > >> >>received > >> > > >> >> > >>this > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately > reply > >> to > >> > > >>the > >> > > >> >> sender > >> > > >> >> > >> and > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>delete > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, > >> > > >>dissemination, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >>distribution, > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>or > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by > unintended > >> > > >> >>recipients > >> > > >> >> is > >> > > >> >> > >> not > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >