Ha, my next question. I want to know too ... I have pushed to master and cherry-pick'd into 2.9.x
My change just added support for a case where XHR was permitted, but there wasn't a json file. It then attempts the script injection to load a .js plugins file, instead of just giving up. This would likely be the case in iOS on/after 3.0.0 or whenever we stop generating both a js+json files. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok so how do we update the JS on all platforms now? coho? > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > Works on WP7 and Jesse reports it working on WP8. > > > > I am merging back into master and retagging JS shortly. > > > > On 6/19/13 2:03 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >I am testing on windows as well. I think I have a change, give me a few > > >minutes to verify. > > > > > >@purplecabbage > > >risingj.com > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Confirmed it works on android iOS and bb10. > > >> > > >> Am gonna help Benn work through and make sure it's working on windows > > >> phone * > > >> > > >> On 6/19/13 1:24 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >> >Yeah, to Braden's point while it may work, the behavior is not > > >>guaranteed, > > >> >and could break later. Also the contents of the file differ between > > >>the 2 > > >> >methods. > > >> > > > >> >Also discussing this in a quick chat with Fil, I think the best > > >>approach > > >> >is: > > >> >1. Plugman generates both files, a js and a json > > >> >2. cordova.js attempts XHR, and catches the exception, in which case > it > > >> >continues on to a script injection attempt. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >@purplecabbage > > >> >risingj.com > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Braden Shepherdson > > >> ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: > > >> > > > >> >> JSON files are not valid Javascript code. > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Can we not have the script tag point to the json file? Does the > > >> >>extension > > >> >> > have to be .js? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On 6/19/13 12:10 PM, "Jesse" <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > >I was just going to suggest outputting both. That works for me. > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >@purplecabbage > > >> >> > >risingj.com > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson > > >> >> > ><bra...@chromium.org>wrote: > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >> Follow-up thought: No reason why we can't generate both > > >> >> > >>cordova_plugins.js > > >> >> > >> and cordova_plugins.json for a while. > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> Braden > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Braden Shepherdson < > > >> >> > bra...@chromium.org > > >> >> > >> >wrote: > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> > Hm. This will of course require changing the name of the > file > > >> >> Plugman > > >> >> > >> > generates, and it will mean users need to be very careful to > > >>be > > >> >> using > > >> >> > >> > sufficiently new plugman and cordova-js. > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > In short: only the upgrade path for users bothers me about > > >>this; > > >> >>the > > >> >> > >> > change to use a .js file and <script> tag looks fine. It's > > >>hard > > >> >>to > > >> >> > >>make > > >> >> > >> > Plugman backward compatible, because it's hard to know which > > >> >>version > > >> >> > >>of > > >> >> > >> > cordova.js it's going to be running against. Any ideas here? > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > Braden > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> >> Ahh shit I think we need to retag the JS > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> The dynamic loading of cordova_plugins.json doesn't work on > > >> >>Windows > > >> >> > >> Phone > > >> >> > >> >> *, as we discussed in the 2.8.0rc1 tag thread. The > workaround > > >> >>that > > >> >> > >>Jesse > > >> >> > >> >> converged on has been sitting on a branch. You can compare > > >>it to > > >> >> > >> apache's > > >> >> > >> >> master branch at [1]. Essentially it creates a script tag > > >> >>pointing > > >> >> to > > >> >> > >> the > > >> >> > >> >> cordova_plugins.json file instead of XHR'ing to it. The XHR > > >> >> approach > > >> >> > >> >> throws an "Access Denied" error on WP*. > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> With this being the last release before 3.0, I think we > need > > >>to > > >> >> > >>include > > >> >> > >> >> this bit of functionality. > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> Thoughts? > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-js/compare/PL > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> On 6/18/13 7:30 AM, "Shazron" <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >I'm still testing > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3530 > > >> >> > >>that I > > >> >> > >> >> >wanted to get into rc1, but I don't want to rush it, I'll > > >>get > > >> >>to > > >> >> all > > >> >> > >> the > > >> >> > >> >> >rc1 tasks for iOS this afternoon. OS X has barely had > > >>changes > > >> >>so I > > >> >> > >>can > > >> >> > >> >> get > > >> >> > >> >> >that done. > > >> >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com > > > > >> >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >> I have the rc tag issues for mobile-spec and the JS > > >>assigned > > >> >>to > > >> >> > >>me. I > > >> >> > >> >> >>will > > >> >> > >> >> >> tag them tomorrow morning unless I hear otherwise. > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> On 6/17/13 2:01 PM, "James Jong" <wjamesj...@gmail.com> > > >> >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >I'm back this week and will start looking at a couple > of > > >>the > > >> >> ones > > >> >> > >> Shaz > > >> >> > >> >> >> >mentioned: CB-3757 , CB-3562. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >-James Jong > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >> >On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Andrew Grieve < > > >> >> agri...@chromium.org > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I would have liked to fix a few more bugs, namely: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Those filed by Abel Muiño (Camera / FileTransfer) > > >>(e.g. > > >> >> > >>cb-3185) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - iOS loading bugs (CB-3005, CB-3530, CB-3534) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> - DisallowOverscroll setting inconsistency between > > >>Android > > >> >> and > > >> >> > >>iOS > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>(Jesse > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> brought this up - no bug filed for this yet I think) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> I was also planning on working on adding some > > >> >> > >> Plugin-behaving-nicely > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>checks > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> on the native side. E.g. log a message if a plugin > > >>takes > > >> >> spends > > >> >> > >> more > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>than > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 50ms on the UI (for iOS) or WebCore (for Android) > > >>thread. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> Of course, I haven't done anything for over 2 weeks, > > >>and > > >> >>so I > > >> >> > >> >> clearly > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>won't > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> get this all done in the next few hours :P. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> So, I'm fine with starting the release now so that we > > >>can > > >> >> focus > > >> >> > >> more > > >> >> > >> >> >>on > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> 3.0. It'll give us a chance to practice our > release-foo > > >> >>some > > >> >> > >>more, > > >> >> > >> >> >>and > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> hopefully make more enhancements to the coho tool > > >>(Steven > > >> >>- > > >> >> I'm > > >> >> > >> >> >>looking > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>at > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> you for the uploading a release part :P). > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Filip Maj > > >><f...@adobe.com > > >> > > > >> >> > >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> Thanks Jeff! > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> On 6/17/13 10:28 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" > > >> >> > >><jheif...@blackberry.com> > > >> >> > >> >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> Yep, all BB10 work is being tracked in JIRA. Check > > >>out > > >> >> > >>CB-3797, > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>CB-3799 > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> On 13-06-17 1:26 PM, "Filip Maj" <f...@adobe.com> > > >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> Good stuff Bryan, is this being tracked on issues > > >> >> anywhere? > > >> >> > >>I'd > > >> >> > >> >> >>like > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>to > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> refer other issues (CLI) to this feature you're > > >> >>speaking > > >> >> of. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> On 6/17/13 10:18 AM, "Bryan Higgins" > > >> >> > >><br...@bryanhiggins.net> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> For BB10, we're working on moving out the > > >>environment > > >> >> > >>settings > > >> >> > >> >> >>from > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> project > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> to HOME. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> That work is pretty much done. We should have it > > >> >>tested > > >> >> and > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>committed > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> within the next few hours. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Ian Clelland > > >> >> > >> >> >><iclell...@google.com > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> The only thing that I'm working on this morning > > >>that > > >> >> could > > >> >> > >> be a > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> candidate > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> for 2.9 is an extension to > FileWriter.write(Blob) > > >> >>that > > >> >> > >>will > > >> >> > >> >> >>accept > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>a > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordova File object in place of a native Blob > > >>object. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> (FileWriter.write(Blob) is CB-2406, and new for > > >>2.9) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> If we consider this a bug to be fixed, then I > can > > >> >>take > > >> >> > >>care > > >> >> > >> of > > >> >> > >> >> >>it > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> post-rc1. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Otherwise, I'll work quickly to get it in this > > >> >>morning. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Filip Maj > > >> >> > >><f...@adobe.com> > > >> >> > >> >> >>wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> SO: we're doing this today ya? Any objections? > > >> >>Anyone > > >> >> > >>still > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>working > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> on > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> something that they are gunning to get in for > > >>2.9? > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 6/14/13 1:12 PM, "Michael Brooks" < > > >> >> > >> >> mich...@michaelbrooks.ca> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Monday RC1 sounds good to me. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Shazron < > > >> >> > >> shaz...@gmail.com > > >> >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Looking at iOS 2.9.0: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Definitely as you said: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3757 > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Then all iOS cli and docs issues. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is time for iOS I am going to > tackle: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3303 > > >>(to > > >> >> fix) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3451 > > >>(to > > >> >> > >> >> >>investigate, > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> no > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> fix > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> yet) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3567 > > >> >>(there > > >> >> > >>is a > > >> >> > >> >> PR > > >> >> > >> >> >>to > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> investigate) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3562(fix > > >> >> in > > >> >> > >>the > > >> >> > >> >> >> issue, > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> to > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> evaluate) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3534(the > > >> >> > >> reporter > > >> >> > >> >> >>has > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> filed > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> an > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> excellent bug report, to repro, and maybe > fix) > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Maybe this Untappd issue: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3574 > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Lorin Beer > < > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> lorin.beer....@gmail.com > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> be the leaf in the wind, Shaz. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Anything pressing on iOS that needs to be > > >> >>resolved? > > >> >> I > > >> >> > >>am > > >> >> > >> >> >>aware > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> of a > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> bug > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> in > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Camera, which I can take a look at. Anything > > >>else > > >> >> you > > >> >> > >> want > > >> >> > >> >> >>in? > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:01 AM, Shazron > > >> >> > >> >> >><shaz...@gmail.com> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> I wish I could say there was more velocity > in > > >> >>the > > >> >> > >>iOS / > > >> >> > >> OS > > >> >> > >> >> >>X > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> repos > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> but > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> there hasn't been any with me being away at > > >>WWDC > > >> >> this > > >> >> > >> >> week, > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> but if > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> that's > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> where the wind blows I am but a feather. > Will > > >> >>try > > >> >> to > > >> >> > >>get > > >> >> > >> >> >>more > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> issues > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved by rc2. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Lorin Beer > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> <lorin.beer....@gmail.com > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1, let's tackle this early > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jesse > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <purplecabb...@gmail.com > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> meh > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> @purplecabbage > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> risingj.com > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Filip > Maj > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> <f...@adobe.com> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Huge +1! > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/12/13 3:56 PM, "Joe Bowser" > > >> >> > >><bows...@gmail.com> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> wrote: > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know this is pretty soon, but how > does > > >>a > > >> >> > >>2.9.0rc1 > > >> >> > >> on > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> Monday > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> sound? > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since this is supposed to be a > hardening > > >> >> release > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> anyway, I > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> don't > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> see > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why we shouldn't start with the RCs. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Joe > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >>>>>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>>>>>>>-- > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> This transmission (including any attachments) may > > >> >>contain > > >> >> > >> >> >>confidential > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> information, privileged material (including > material > > >> >> > >>protected > > >> >> > >> by > > >> >> > >> >> >>the > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), > or > > >> >> > >>constitute > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> non-public information. Any use of this information > > >>by > > >> >> anyone > > >> >> > >> >> other > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>than > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have > > >> >>received > > >> >> > >>this > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> transmission in error, please immediately reply to > > >>the > > >> >> sender > > >> >> > >> and > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>delete > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> this information from your system. Use, > > >>dissemination, > > >> >> > >> >> >>distribution, > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>>or > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> reproduction of this transmission by unintended > > >> >>recipients > > >> >> is > > >> >> > >> not > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>>> authorized and may be unlawful. > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >>> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >
