I suppose - but for 3.0 we are a lock for xml, and we are probably going to support it for a while? or 4.0? ;)
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd say we should hold off on this particular work. The schema is > changing pretty rapidly and this would just fall out of sync. That and > there is pretty strong argument brewing to move to JSON. > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Carlos Santana <[email protected]> > wrote: > > +1 > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Would it make sense to have an xsd (XML schema) file for plugin.xml and > >> config.xml, so that folks could programatically validate their xml files > >> against the schema with a tool like xmllint? > >> > >> I'd be happy to do that. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carlos Santana > > <[email protected]> >
