Not quite deprecation I suppose, but fight club ;) (we know how this one ends)
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, nothing saying we can't support two formats and let the likely > one die appropriately. > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suppose - but for 3.0 we are a lock for xml, and we are probably going > to > > support it for a while? or 4.0? ;) > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'd say we should hold off on this particular work. The schema is > >> changing pretty rapidly and this would just fall out of sync. That and > >> there is pretty strong argument brewing to move to JSON. > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Carlos Santana <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > +1 > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Would it make sense to have an xsd (XML schema) file for plugin.xml > and > >> >> config.xml, so that folks could programatically validate their xml > files > >> >> against the schema with a tool like xmllint? > >> >> > >> >> I'd be happy to do that. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Carlos Santana > >> > <[email protected]> > >> >
