config.tylerdurden
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > Not quite deprecation I suppose, but fight club ;) (we know how this one > ends) > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well, nothing saying we can't support two formats and let the likely >> one die appropriately. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I suppose - but for 3.0 we are a lock for xml, and we are probably going >> to >> > support it for a while? or 4.0? ;) >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I'd say we should hold off on this particular work. The schema is >> >> changing pretty rapidly and this would just fall out of sync. That and >> >> there is pretty strong argument brewing to move to JSON. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Carlos Santana <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Would it make sense to have an xsd (XML schema) file for plugin.xml >> and >> >> >> config.xml, so that folks could programatically validate their xml >> files >> >> >> against the schema with a tool like xmllint? >> >> >> >> >> >> I'd be happy to do that. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Carlos Santana >> >> > <[email protected]> >> >> >>
